[PATCH v4 00/19] Share TTM code among DRM framebuffer drivers

[Gerd Hoffmann]

On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 10:26:30AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Several simple framebuffer drivers copy most of the TTM code from each
> other. The implementation is always the same; except for the name of
> some data structures.
> 
> As recently discussed, this patch set provides generic memory-management
> code for simple framebuffers with dedicated video memory. It further
> converts the respective drivers to the generic code. The shared code
> is basically the same implementation as the one copied among individual
> drivers.
> 
> The patch set contains two major changes: first, it introduces
> |struct drm_gem_vram_object| and helpers (GEM VRAM). It's a GEM object
> that is backed by VRAM. The type's purpose is somewhat similar to
> |struct drm_gem_{cma, shmem}_object|: it provides an commom implementation
> that handles all the basic cases. Second, the patch set introduces
> |struct drm_vram_mm| and helpers (VRAM MM). It's an implementation of a
> basic memory manager for VRAM.
> 
> Both, GEM VRAM and VRAM MM, support buffer placement in VRAM and system
> memory. Both can be used independedly from each other if desired by the
> DRM driver.

Looks good to me overall, some small nits in replies to patches.

> Currently ast, bochs, mgag200, vboxvideo and hisilicon/hibmc can use
> these helpers.

I've tested bochs on qemu, works fine.
What is the testing status of the other drivers?

cheers,
  Gerd