[PATCH 11/11] drm/amdgpu: stop removing BOs from the LRU during CS
Zhou, David(ChunMing)
David1.Zhou at amd.com
Wed May 15 14:27:23 UTC 2019
Ah, sorry, I missed "+ ttm_bo_move_to_lru_tail(bo, NULL);".
Right, moving them to end before releasing is fixing my concern.
Sorry for noise.
-David
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] drm/amdgpu: stop removing BOs from the LRU during CS
From: "Koenig, Christian"
To: "Zhou, David(ChunMing)" ,"Olsak, Marek" ,"Liang, Prike" ,dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org,amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
CC:
[CAUTION: External Email]
BO list? No, we stop removing them from the LRU.
But we still move them to the end of the LRU before releasing them.
Christian.
Am 15.05.19 um 16:21 schrieb Zhou, David(ChunMing):
Isn't this patch trying to stop removing for all BOs from bo list?
-David
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] drm/amdgpu: stop removing BOs from the LRU during CS
From: Christian König
To: "Zhou, David(ChunMing)" ,"Koenig, Christian" ,"Olsak, Marek" ,"Liang, Prike" ,dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org,amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org<mailto:dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org,amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org>
CC:
[CAUTION: External Email]
That is a good point, but actually not a problem in practice.
See the change to ttm_eu_fence_buffer_objects:
- ttm_bo_add_to_lru(bo);
+ if (list_empty(&bo->lru))
+ ttm_bo_add_to_lru(bo);
+ else
+ ttm_bo_move_to_lru_tail(bo, NULL);
We still move the BOs to the end of the LRU in the same order we have before, we just don't remove them when they are reserved.
Regards,
Christian.
Am 14.05.19 um 16:31 schrieb Zhou, David(ChunMing):
how to refresh LRU to keep the order align with bo list passed from user space?
you can verify it by some games, performance could be different much between multiple runnings.
-David
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] drm/amdgpu: stop removing BOs from the LRU during CS
From: Christian König
To: "Zhou, David(ChunMing)" ,"Olsak, Marek" ,"Liang, Prike" ,dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org,amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org<mailto:dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org,amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org>
CC:
[CAUTION: External Email]
Hui? What do you mean with that?
Christian.
Am 14.05.19 um 15:12 schrieb Zhou, David(ChunMing):
my only concern is how to fresh LRU when bo is from bo list.
-David
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [PATCH 11/11] drm/amdgpu: stop removing BOs from the LRU during CS
From: Christian König
To: "Olsak, Marek" ,"Zhou, David(ChunMing)" ,"Liang, Prike" ,dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org,amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org<mailto:dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org,amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org>
CC:
[CAUTION: External Email]
This avoids OOM situations when we have lots of threads
submitting at the same time.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com><mailto:christian.koenig at amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
index fff558cf385b..f9240a94217b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
@@ -648,7 +648,7 @@ static int amdgpu_cs_parser_bos(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p,
}
r = ttm_eu_reserve_buffers(&p->ticket, &p->validated, true,
- &duplicates, true);
+ &duplicates, false);
if (unlikely(r != 0)) {
if (r != -ERESTARTSYS)
DRM_ERROR("ttm_eu_reserve_buffers failed.\n");
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org<mailto:amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org>
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20190515/ec93ca83/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list