[PATCH 1/2 v2] drm/doc: Allow new UAPI to be used once it's in drm-next/drm-misc-next.
Eric Anholt
eric at anholt.net
Thu May 16 16:38:05 UTC 2019
Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 03:06:38PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> I was trying to figure out if it was permissible to merge the Mesa
>> side of V3D's CSD support yet while it's in drm-misc-next but not
>> drm-next, and developers on #dri-devel IRC had differing opinions of
>> what the requirement was.
>>
>> v2: Restrict to just drm-next or drm-misc-next on airlied's request.
>
> Personally I think that's a bit too strict (if people want to screw up,
> they will be able to anyway). But since I'm all for clearer rules where
> possible, this has my support too.
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
Pushed to drm-misc-next now.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20190516/3e0f077f/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list