drm-sync timeline signaling
Lionel Landwerlin
lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com
Tue May 21 13:27:23 UTC 2019
Thanks David,
Initially I thought we could run into wait issues with a dma_fence_chain
with a value = 0, but you're right, it works fine.
We could just avoid to create a dma_fence_chain object, but maybe we
don't care.
-Lionel
On 21/05/2019 09:51, zhoucm1 wrote:
> Sorry for late response.
>
> Although we don't expect that, drm_syncobj_timeline_signal_ioctl
> already handle this case I think. Which can handle both (point value >
> 0) and (point value = 0).
>
>
> -David
>
>
> On 2019年05月21日 16:44, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
>> [CAUTION: External Email]
>>
>> Ping?
>>
>> On 16/05/2019 15:49, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> While picking up the IGT tests for timeline syncobj,
>>> I noticed that although we deal with multi wait across both timeline
>>> (with point value > 0) and binary (point value = 0) syncobjs,
>>> we don't seem to have a similar behavior with signaling.
>>>
>>> Do you have any thought on this?
>>> I'm considering writing some docs but I'm not quite sure whether this
>>> difference between signaling/waiting was intentional or just
>>> overlooked.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> -Lionel
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dri-devel mailing list
>>> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>>
>>
>
>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list