[PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-tfp410: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get_index()
Linus Walleij
linus.walleij at linaro.org
Tue Nov 5 15:29:39 UTC 2019
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:40 AM Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:43:20AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Instead of fwnode_get_named_gpiod() that I plan to hide away, let's use
> > the new fwnode_gpiod_get_index() that mimics gpiod_get_index(), but
> > works with arbitrary firmware node.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov at gmail.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Andrzej, Neil,
> >
> > This depends on the new code that can be bound in
> > ib-fwnode-gpiod-get-index immutable branch of Linus' Walleij tree:
> >
> > git pull git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-gpio.git ib-fwnode-gpiod-get-index
> >
> > I hope that it would be possible to pull in this immutable branch and
> > not wait until after 5.5 merge window, or, alternatively, merge through
> > Linus Walleij's tree.
>
> Any chance this could be merged, please?
I'm happy to merge it into the GPIO tree if some DRM maintainer can
provide an ACK.
Getting ACK from DRM people is problematic and a bit of friction in the
community, DVetter usually advice to seek mutual reviews etc, but IMO
it would be better if some people felt more compelled to review stuff
eventually. (And that has the problem that it doesn't scale.)
Yours,
Linus Walleij
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list