drm core/helpers and MIT license
Noralf Trønnes
noralf at tronnes.org
Fri Nov 15 14:33:46 UTC 2019
Den 15.11.2019 13.34, skrev Ville Syrjälä:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 08:01:32PM +0000, coypu at sdf.org wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> I don't think we can make any complaints about GPL being more widely
>> used in the DRM code. It's nice to have the code at all, the MIT license
>> is a bonus. Thanks for writing it and bearing with us.
>>
>> Would rewrites done purely for licensing reasons be accepted upstream?
>
> Rewrite should be the last resort. I think a lot of the GPL only stuff
> is quite recent so there's a good chance the author(s) are still around
> to discuss relicensing.
>
If someone sends patches to MIT license the work I've done, I'll be
happy to ack it. It's only recently that I've been aware of the fact
that MIT licensed was a thing in the kernel. I was under the impression
that all new code should be GPL and MIT were for code imported from
elsewhere. I would love to see my work being used on the BSD's.
Noralf.
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list