[PATCH v4] drm/scheduler: Avoid accessing freed bad job.

Deucher, Alexander Alexander.Deucher at amd.com
Tue Nov 26 15:36:57 UTC 2019


I recently updated amd-staging-drm-next.  Apply whatever makes sense for now and it'll naturally fall out in the next rebase.

Alex
________________________________
From: Grodzovsky, Andrey <Andrey.Grodzovsky at amd.com>
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2019 7:09 PM
To: Deng, Emily <Emily.Deng at amd.com>
Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org <dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org>; amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org <amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org>; Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig at amd.com>; steven.price at arm.com <steven.price at arm.com>; Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher at amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] drm/scheduler: Avoid accessing freed bad job.

Christian asked to submit it to drm-misc instead of our drm-next to avoid later conflicts with Steven's patch which he mentioned in this thread which is not in drm-next yet.
Christian, Alex, once this merged to drm-misc I guess we need to pull all latest changes from there to drm-next so the issue Emily reported can be avoided.

Andrey

________________________________________
From: Deng, Emily <Emily.Deng at amd.com>
Sent: 25 November 2019 16:44:36
To: Grodzovsky, Andrey
Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org; amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; Koenig, Christian; steven.price at arm.com; Grodzovsky, Andrey
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4] drm/scheduler: Avoid accessing freed bad job.

[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]

Hi Andrey,
    Seems you didn't submit this patch?

Best wishes
Emily Deng



>-----Original Message-----
>From: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky at amd.com>
>Sent: Monday, November 25, 2019 12:51 PM
>Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org; amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; Koenig,
>Christian <Christian.Koenig at amd.com>; Deng, Emily
><Emily.Deng at amd.com>; steven.price at arm.com; Grodzovsky, Andrey
><Andrey.Grodzovsky at amd.com>
>Subject: [PATCH v4] drm/scheduler: Avoid accessing freed bad job.
>
>Problem:
>Due to a race between drm_sched_cleanup_jobs in sched thread and
>drm_sched_job_timedout in timeout work there is a possiblity that bad job
>was already freed while still being accessed from the timeout thread.
>
>Fix:
>Instead of just peeking at the bad job in the mirror list remove it from the list
>under lock and then put it back later when we are garanteed no race with
>main sched thread is possible which is after the thread is parked.
>
>v2: Lock around processing ring_mirror_list in drm_sched_cleanup_jobs.
>
>v3: Rebase on top of drm-misc-next. v2 is not needed anymore as
>drm_sched_get_cleanup_job already has a lock there.
>
>v4: Fix comments to relfect latest code in drm-misc.
>
>Signed-off-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky at amd.com>
>Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>Tested-by: Emily Deng <Emily.Deng at amd.com>
>---
> drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 27
>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>index 6774955..1bf9c40 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>@@ -284,10 +284,21 @@ static void drm_sched_job_timedout(struct
>work_struct *work)
>       unsigned long flags;
>
>       sched = container_of(work, struct drm_gpu_scheduler,
>work_tdr.work);
>+
>+      /* Protects against concurrent deletion in
>drm_sched_get_cleanup_job */
>+      spin_lock_irqsave(&sched->job_list_lock, flags);
>       job = list_first_entry_or_null(&sched->ring_mirror_list,
>                                      struct drm_sched_job, node);
>
>       if (job) {
>+              /*
>+               * Remove the bad job so it cannot be freed by concurrent
>+               * drm_sched_cleanup_jobs. It will be reinserted back after
>sched->thread
>+               * is parked at which point it's safe.
>+               */
>+              list_del_init(&job->node);
>+              spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched->job_list_lock, flags);
>+
>               job->sched->ops->timedout_job(job);
>
>               /*
>@@ -298,6 +309,8 @@ static void drm_sched_job_timedout(struct
>work_struct *work)
>                       job->sched->ops->free_job(job);
>                       sched->free_guilty = false;
>               }
>+      } else {
>+              spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched->job_list_lock, flags);
>       }
>
>       spin_lock_irqsave(&sched->job_list_lock, flags); @@ -370,6 +383,20
>@@ void drm_sched_stop(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched, struct
>drm_sched_job *bad)
>       kthread_park(sched->thread);
>
>       /*
>+       * Reinsert back the bad job here - now it's safe as
>+       * drm_sched_get_cleanup_job cannot race against us and release the
>+       * bad job at this point - we parked (waited for) any in progress
>+       * (earlier) cleanups and drm_sched_get_cleanup_job will not be
>called
>+       * now until the scheduler thread is unparked.
>+       */
>+      if (bad && bad->sched == sched)
>+              /*
>+               * Add at the head of the queue to reflect it was the earliest
>+               * job extracted.
>+               */
>+              list_add(&bad->node, &sched->ring_mirror_list);
>+
>+      /*
>        * Iterate the job list from later to  earlier one and either deactive
>        * their HW callbacks or remove them from mirror list if they already
>        * signaled.
>--
>2.7.4
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20191126/dda96c24/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the dri-devel mailing list