New sysfs interface for privacy screens
Mat King
mathewk at google.com
Tue Oct 1 16:42:58 UTC 2019
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 10:27 AM Greg KH <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 10:09:46AM -0600, Mat King wrote:
> > Resending in plain text mode
> >
> > I have been looking into adding Linux support for electronic privacy
> > screens which is a feature on some new laptops which is built into the
> > display and allows users to turn it on instead of needing to use a
> > physical privacy filter. In discussions with my colleagues the idea of
> > using either /sys/class/backlight or /sys/class/leds but this new
> > feature does not seem to quite fit into either of those classes.
> >
> > I am proposing adding a class called "privacy_screen" to interface
> > with these devices. The initial API would be simple just a single
> > property called "privacy_state" which when set to 1 would mean that
> > privacy is enabled and 0 when privacy is disabled.
> >
> > Current known use cases will use ACPI _DSM in order to interface with
> > the privacy screens, but this class would allow device driver authors
> > to use other interfaces as well.
> >
> > Example:
> >
> > # get privacy screen state
> > cat /sys/class/privacy_screen/cros_privacy/privacy_state # 1: privacy
> > enabled 0: privacy disabled
> >
> > # set privacy enabled
> > echo 1 > /sys/class/privacy_screen/cros_privacy/privacy_state
>
> What is "cros_privacy" here?
This would be set by the device driver. This example would be for a
Chrome OS privacy screen device, but the driver would set the name
just like in the backlight class.
>
> > Does this approach seem to be reasonable?
>
> Seems sane to me, do you have any code that implements this so we can
> see it?
It is still early in the implementation so there is no code quite yet.
I wanted to get some general feedback on the approach first. As soon
as I have code to share I will post it.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Thank you for the feedback.
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list