[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] dma-fence: Serialise signal enabling (dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling)
Ruhl, Michael J
michael.j.ruhl at intel.com
Thu Oct 3 14:12:38 UTC 2019
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
>Chris Wilson
>Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2019 9:24 AM
>To: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
>Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] dma-fence: Serialise signal enabling
>(dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling)
>
>Make dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling() behave like its
>dma_fence_add_callback() and dma_fence_default_wait() counterparts and
>perform the test to enable signaling under the fence->lock, along with
>the action to do so. This ensure that should an implementation be trying
>to flush the cb_list (by signaling) on retirement before freeing the
>fence, it can do so in a race-free manner.
>
>See also 0fc89b6802ba ("dma-fence: Simply wrap dma_fence_signal_locked
>with dma_fence_signal").
>
>v2: Refactor all 3 enable_signaling paths to use a common function.
>
>Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
>---
>Return false for "could not _enable_ signaling as it was already
>signaled"
>---
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
>index 2c136aee3e79..b58528c1cc9d 100644
>--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
>+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
>@@ -273,6 +273,30 @@ void dma_fence_free(struct dma_fence *fence)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_fence_free);
>
>+static bool __dma_fence_enable_signaling(struct dma_fence *fence)
>+{
>+ bool was_set;
>+
>+ lockdep_assert_held(fence->lock);
With this held...
>+ was_set =
>test_and_set_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_ENABLE_SIGNAL_BIT,
>+ &fence->flags);
>+
>+ if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->flags))
>+ return false;
Would making these the non-atomic versions be useful (and/or reasonable)?
Mike
>+
>+ if (!was_set && fence->ops->enable_signaling) {
>+ if (!fence->ops->enable_signaling(fence)) {
>+ dma_fence_signal_locked(fence);
>+ return false;
>+ }
>+
>+ trace_dma_fence_enable_signal(fence);
>+ }
>+
>+ return true;
>+}
>+
> /**
> * dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling - enable signaling on fence
> * @fence: the fence to enable
>@@ -285,19 +309,12 @@ void dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling(struct
>dma_fence *fence)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
>
>- if (!test_and_set_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_ENABLE_SIGNAL_BIT,
>- &fence->flags) &&
>- !test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->flags) &&
>- fence->ops->enable_signaling) {
>- trace_dma_fence_enable_signal(fence);
>-
>- spin_lock_irqsave(fence->lock, flags);
>-
>- if (!fence->ops->enable_signaling(fence))
>- dma_fence_signal_locked(fence);
>+ if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->flags))
>+ return;
>
>- spin_unlock_irqrestore(fence->lock, flags);
>- }
>+ spin_lock_irqsave(fence->lock, flags);
>+ __dma_fence_enable_signaling(fence);
>+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(fence->lock, flags);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling);
>
>@@ -331,7 +348,6 @@ int dma_fence_add_callback(struct dma_fence
>*fence, struct dma_fence_cb *cb,
> {
> unsigned long flags;
> int ret = 0;
>- bool was_set;
>
> if (WARN_ON(!fence || !func))
> return -EINVAL;
>@@ -343,25 +359,14 @@ int dma_fence_add_callback(struct dma_fence
>*fence, struct dma_fence_cb *cb,
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(fence->lock, flags);
>
>- was_set =
>test_and_set_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_ENABLE_SIGNAL_BIT,
>- &fence->flags);
>-
>- if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->flags))
>- ret = -ENOENT;
>- else if (!was_set && fence->ops->enable_signaling) {
>- trace_dma_fence_enable_signal(fence);
>-
>- if (!fence->ops->enable_signaling(fence)) {
>- dma_fence_signal_locked(fence);
>- ret = -ENOENT;
>- }
>- }
>-
>- if (!ret) {
>+ if (__dma_fence_enable_signaling(fence)) {
> cb->func = func;
> list_add_tail(&cb->node, &fence->cb_list);
>- } else
>+ } else {
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cb->node);
>+ ret = -ENOENT;
>+ }
>+
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(fence->lock, flags);
>
> return ret;
>@@ -461,7 +466,6 @@ dma_fence_default_wait(struct dma_fence *fence,
>bool intr, signed long timeout)
> struct default_wait_cb cb;
> unsigned long flags;
> signed long ret = timeout ? timeout : 1;
>- bool was_set;
>
> if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->flags))
> return ret;
>@@ -473,21 +477,9 @@ dma_fence_default_wait(struct dma_fence *fence,
>bool intr, signed long timeout)
> goto out;
> }
>
>- was_set =
>test_and_set_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_ENABLE_SIGNAL_BIT,
>- &fence->flags);
>-
>- if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->flags))
>+ if (!__dma_fence_enable_signaling(fence))
> goto out;
>
>- if (!was_set && fence->ops->enable_signaling) {
>- trace_dma_fence_enable_signal(fence);
>-
>- if (!fence->ops->enable_signaling(fence)) {
>- dma_fence_signal_locked(fence);
>- goto out;
>- }
>- }
>-
> if (!timeout) {
> ret = 0;
> goto out;
>--
>2.23.0
>
>_______________________________________________
>Intel-gfx mailing list
>Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list