[PATCH][next] drm/komeda: remove redundant assignment to pointer disable_done
james qian wang (Arm Technology China)
james.qian.wang at arm.com
Tue Oct 8 08:06:33 UTC 2019
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 04:25:05PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 10:53:44PM +0100, Colin Ian King wrote:
> > On 04/10/2019 20:27, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 05:21:56PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> > >> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>
> > >>
> > >> The pointer disable_done is being initialized with a value that
> > >> is never read and is being re-assigned a little later on. The
> > >> assignment is redundant and hence can be removed.
> > >
> > > Not really true, isn't it? The re-assignment is done under the condition that
> > > crtc->state->active is true. disable_done will be used regardless after the if
> > > block, so we can't skip this initialisation.
> > >
> > > Not sure why Coverity flags this, but I would NAK this patch.
> > I'm patching against the driver from linux-next so I believe this is OK
> > for that. I believe your statement is true against linux which does not
> > have commit:
> > d6cb013579e743bc7bc5590ca35a1943f2b8f3c8
> > Author: Lowry Li (Arm Technology China) <Lowry.Li at arm.com>
> > Date: Fri Sep 6 07:18:06 2019 +0000
> It really does help reviewing patches when this is mentioned in the
> commit message.
> There is some debate about whether this should be mentioned as a Fixes
> since it doesn't fix a bug. I initialy felt it shouldn't be, but now
> I think enough people think it should be listed as Fixes that I must be
> wrong. Either way, it's very useful information.
> The other thing is that soon get_maintainer.pl will start CC'ing people
> from the Fixes tag and right now Lowry Li is not CC'd so that's
> dan carpenter
Colin's code is right.
Following code I copied from linux-next, and I checked drm-misc, the
code are same.
struct komeda_pipeline *slave = kcrtc->slave;
//---- First initialization.
struct completion *disable_done = &crtc->state->commit->flip_done;
bool needs_phase2 = false;
DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("CRTC%d_DISABLE: active_pipes: 0x%x, affected: 0x%x\n",
if (slave && has_bit(slave->id, old_st->active_pipes))
if (has_bit(master->id, old_st->active_pipes))
needs_phase2 = komeda_pipeline_disable(master, old->state);
//---- Secondary initialization.
disable_done = (needs_phase2 || crtc->state->active) ?
NULL : &crtc->state->commit->flip_done;
//--- First using is here.
/* wait phase 1 disable done */
So the first initialization with the delcaration is unnecessary.
And I also checked our internal testing branch which actually doesn't have
the first initialization. seems somethings wrong when lowry submit this to
Thanks for the fix. I'll push it to drm-misc-fixes
Reviewed-by: James Qian Wang (Arm Technology China) <james.qian.wang at arm.com>
More information about the dri-devel