drm/mcde: Reconsider duplicate statement in mcde_probe()
Markus.Elfring at web.de
Mon Oct 28 17:00:04 UTC 2019
I have taken another look also at the implementation of the function “mcde_probe”.
Now I wonder why the statement “drm->dev_private = mcde;” was specified twice there.
How do you think about to delete one of them so that a duplicate assignment
can be avoided?
More information about the dri-devel