[Bug 111588] Framebuffer corruption when a fb which is not being scanned out gets removed

bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Sun Sep 8 12:37:39 UTC 2019


https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111588

--- Comment #1 from Hans de Goede <jwrdegoede at fedoraproject.org> ---
I just realized I left out one bit of info which might be useful, to debug this
I added the following change to the kernel:

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c
index 57564318ceea..4712bfb9ae05 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c
@@ -464,6 +464,7 @@ int drm_mode_rmfb(struct drm_device *dev, u32 fb_id,
        if (drm_framebuffer_read_refcount(fb) > 1) {
                struct drm_mode_rmfb_work arg;

+               pr_err("drm_modr_rmfb calling drm_framebuffer_remove\n");
                INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&arg.work, drm_mode_rmfb_work_fn);
                INIT_LIST_HEAD(&arg.fbs);
                list_add_tail(&fb->filp_head, &arg.fbs);
@@ -471,8 +472,10 @@ int drm_mode_rmfb(struct drm_device *dev, u32 fb_id,
                schedule_work(&arg.work);
                flush_work(&arg.work);
                destroy_work_on_stack(&arg.work);
-       } else
+       } else {
+               pr_err("drm_modr_rmfb calling drm_framebuffer_put\n");
                drm_framebuffer_put(fb);
+       }

        return 0;

@@ -669,11 +672,13 @@ void drm_fb_release(struct drm_file *priv)
         */
        list_for_each_entry_safe(fb, tfb, &priv->fbs, filp_head) {
                if (drm_framebuffer_read_refcount(fb) > 1) {
+                       pr_err("drm_fb_release calling
drm_framebuffer_remove\n");
                        list_move_tail(&fb->filp_head, &arg.fbs);
                } else {
                        list_del_init(&fb->filp_head);

                        /* This drops the fpriv->fbs reference. */
+                       pr_err("drm_fb_release calling drm_framebuffer_put\n");
                        drm_framebuffer_put(fb);
                }
        }
@@ -863,6 +868,8 @@ static int atomic_remove_fb(struct drm_framebuffer *fb)
                if (plane->state->fb != fb)
                        continue;

+               pr_err("atomic_remove_fb found plane still using fb\n");
+
                plane_state = drm_atomic_get_plane_state(state, plane);
                if (IS_ERR(plane_state)) {
                        ret = PTR_ERR(plane_state);


In the working case, so where we let the kernel do the fb cleanup itself, I
see:

Plymouth removes fb it creates to test for 32bpp support:
kernel: drm_modr_rmfb calling drm_framebuffer_put

gdm starts, does page-flipping, resulting in a number of:

kernel: drm_modr_rmfb calling drm_framebuffer_put
kernel: drm_modr_rmfb calling drm_framebuffer_put
...

lines

And then plymouth exits without any cleanup, so we get:
kernel: drm_fb_release calling drm_framebuffer_put

Followed by more:

kernel: drm_modr_rmfb calling drm_framebuffer_put
kernel: drm_modr_rmfb calling drm_framebuffer_put
...

>From gdm.

In the broken case, where ply_renderer_buffer_free() gets called on
plymouth-quit, I only see:

kernel: drm_modr_rmfb calling drm_framebuffer_put
kernel: drm_modr_rmfb calling drm_framebuffer_put
...

lines, wihch is expected as the fb is rmfb-ed before the fd is closed.

Note that we never hit:

@@ -863,6 +868,8 @@ static int atomic_remove_fb(struct drm_framebuffer *fb)
                if (plane->state->fb != fb)
                        continue;

+               pr_err("atomic_remove_fb found plane still using fb\n");
+
                plane_state = drm_atomic_get_plane_state(state, plane);
                if (IS_ERR(plane_state)) {
                        ret = PTR_ERR(plane_state);


So AFAICT userspace is doing everything correctly even in the broken case.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20190908/e7cf25e7/attachment.html>


More information about the dri-devel mailing list