[PATCH v4 2/9] dt-bindings: display, renesas,du: Document cmms property

[Kieran Bingham]

Hi Jacopo,

On 06/09/2019 14:54, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> Document the newly added 'cmms' property which accepts a list of phandle
> and channel index pairs that point to the CMM units available for each
> Display Unit output video channel.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas at jmondi.org>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt
> index c97dfacad281..1773b0a2f54f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt
> @@ -45,6 +45,10 @@ Required Properties:
>      instance that serves the DU channel, and the channel index identifies the
>      LIF instance in that VSP.
> 
> +  - renesas,cmms: A list of phandles to the CMM instances present in the SoC,
> +    one for each available DU channel. The property shall not be specified for
> +    SoCs that do not provide any CMM (such as V3M and V3H).
> +
>  Required nodes:
> 
>  The connections to the DU output video ports are modeled using the OF graph
> @@ -91,6 +95,7 @@ Example: R8A7795 (R-Car H3) ES2.0 DU
>  			 <&cpg CPG_MOD 721>;
>  		clock-names = "du.0", "du.1", "du.2", "du.3";
>  		vsps = <&vspd0 0>, <&vspd1 0>, <&vspd2 0>, <&vspd0 1>;
> +		renesas,cmms = <&cmm0 &cmm1 &cmm2 &cmm3>;

Should these be comma separated in the same fashion as the vsps are
separated?

I don't really mind either way though ...

Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas at ideasonboard.com>


> 
>  		ports {
>  			#address-cells = <1>;
> --
> 2.23.0
>