[PATCH libdrm] meson: Fix sys/mkdev.h detection on Solaris
Alan Coopersmith
alan.coopersmith at oracle.com
Fri Sep 13 23:26:55 UTC 2019
On 9/10/19 5:55 AM, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> On Monday, 2019-09-09 16:51:16 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>> On Solaris, sys/sysmacros.h has long-deprecated copies of major() & minor()
>> but not makedev(). sys/mkdev.h has all three and is the preferred choice.
>>
>> So we check for sys/mkdev.h first, as autoconf's AC_HEADER_MAJOR does.
>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom at intel.com>
>
> Alternatively, how about this?
> ---8<---
> diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build
> index bc5cfc588d0c621a9725..263f691ab2b9107f5be1 100644
> --- a/meson.build
> +++ b/meson.build
> @@ -183,9 +183,14 @@ foreach header : ['sys/sysctl.h', 'sys/select.h', 'alloca.h']
> config.set('HAVE_' + header.underscorify().to_upper(),
> cc.compiles('#include <@0@>'.format(header), name : '@0@ works'.format(header)))
> endforeach
> -if cc.has_header_symbol('sys/sysmacros.h', 'major')
> +if (cc.has_header_symbol('sys/sysmacros.h', 'major') and
> + cc.has_header_symbol('sys/sysmacros.h', 'minor') and
> + cc.has_header_symbol('sys/sysmacros.h', 'makedev'))
> config.set10('MAJOR_IN_SYSMACROS', true)
> -elif cc.has_header_symbol('sys/mkdev.h', 'major')
> +endif
> +if (cc.has_header_symbol('sys/mkdev.h', 'major') and
> + cc.has_header_symbol('sys/mkdev.h', 'minor') and
> + cc.has_header_symbol('sys/mkdev.h', 'makedev'))
> config.set10('MAJOR_IN_MKDEV', true)
> endif
> config.set10('HAVE_OPEN_MEMSTREAM', cc.has_function('open_memstream'))
> --->8---
>
> Makes both checks independent and represent the reality of what's wanted
> more accurately (despite the historical name of the macro).
That works:
Header <sys/sysmacros.h> has symbol "major" : YES (cached)
Header <sys/sysmacros.h> has symbol "minor" : YES
Header <sys/sysmacros.h> has symbol "makedev" : NO
Header <sys/mkdev.h> has symbol "major" : YES
Header <sys/mkdev.h> has symbol "minor" : YES
Header <sys/mkdev.h> has symbol "makedev" : YES
Would you like me to resubmit with that, or do you want to submit it?
If you want to go ahead, then:
Reviewed-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith at oracle.com>
Tested-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith at oracle.com>
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Engineering - https://blogs.oracle.com/alanc
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list