blocking ops in drm_sched_cleanup_jobs()
Koenig, Christian
Christian.Koenig at amd.com
Wed Sep 25 14:12:06 UTC 2019
Am 25.09.19 um 16:06 schrieb Steven Price:
> On 24/09/2019 10:55, Koenig, Christian wrote:
>> Sorry for the delayed response, have been busy on other stuff last week.
>>
>> Am 17.09.19 um 14:46 schrieb Steven Price:
>>> On 17/09/2019 09:42, Koenig, Christian wrote:
>>>> Hi Steven,
>>>>
>>>> thought about that issue a bit more and I think I came up with a
>>>> solution.
>>>>
>>>> What you could do is to split up drm_sched_cleanup_jobs() into two
>>>> functions.
>>>>
>>>> One that checks if jobs to be cleaned up are present and one which does
>>>> the actual cleanup.
>>>>
>>>> This way we could call drm_sched_cleanup_jobs() outside of the
>>>> wait_event_interruptible().
>>> Yes that seems like a good solution - there doesn't seem to be a good
>>> reason why the actual job cleanup needs to be done within the
>>> wait_event_interruptible() condition. I did briefly attempt that
>>> before, but I couldn't work out exactly what the condition is which
>>> should cause the wake (my initial attempt caused continuous wake-ups).
>> Basically you need something like the following:
>>
>> 1. Test is timeout worker is running:
>>
>> if (sched->timeout != MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT &&
>> !cancel_delayed_work(&sched->work_tdr))
>> return false;
>>
>> 2. Test if there is any job ready to be cleaned up.
>>
>> job = list_first_entry_or_null(&sched->ring_mirror_list, struct
>> drm_sched_job, node);
>> if (!job || !dma_fence_is_signaled(&job->s_fence->finished))
>> return false;
>>
>> That should basically do it.
> Thanks for the pointers. I wasn't sure if the "queue timeout for next
> job" part was necessary or not if step 2 above returns false.
>
> I've been testing the following patch which simply pulls the
> sched->ops->free_job() out of the wait_event_interruptible().
>
> I'll try with just the tests you've described.
>
> ----8<-----
> From 873c1816394beee72904e64aa2ee0f169e768d76 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Steven Price <steven.price at arm.com>
> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:08:50 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] drm: Don't free jobs in wait_event_interruptible()
>
> drm_sched_cleanup_jobs() attempts to free finished jobs, however because
> it is called as the condition of wait_event_interruptible() it must not
> sleep. Unfortuantly some free callbacks (notibly for Panfrost) do sleep.
>
> Instead let's rename drm_sched_cleanup_jobs() to
> drm_sched_get_cleanup_job() and simply return a job for processing if
> there is one. The caller can then call the free_job() callback outside
> the wait_event_interruptible() where sleeping is possible before
> re-checking and returning to sleep if necessary.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price at arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> index 9a0ee74d82dc..bf9b4931ddfd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> @@ -622,20 +622,21 @@ static void drm_sched_process_job(struct dma_fence *f, struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
> }
>
> /**
> - * drm_sched_cleanup_jobs - destroy finished jobs
> + * drm_sched_get_cleanup_job - fetch the next finished job to be destroyed
> *
> * @sched: scheduler instance
> *
> - * Remove all finished jobs from the mirror list and destroy them.
> + * Returns the next finished job from the mirror list (if there is one)
> + * ready for it to be destroyed.
> */
> -static void drm_sched_cleanup_jobs(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
> +static struct drm_sched_job *drm_sched_get_cleanup_job(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
>
> /* Don't destroy jobs while the timeout worker is running */
> if (sched->timeout != MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT &&
> !cancel_delayed_work(&sched->work_tdr))
> - return;
> + return NULL;
>
>
> while (!list_empty(&sched->ring_mirror_list)) {
Yeah, you should probably clean that up a bit here, but apart from that
this should work as well.
Regards,
Christian.
> @@ -651,7 +652,7 @@ static void drm_sched_cleanup_jobs(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
> list_del_init(&job->node);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched->job_list_lock, flags);
>
> - sched->ops->free_job(job);
> + return job;
> }
>
> /* queue timeout for next job */
> @@ -659,6 +660,7 @@ static void drm_sched_cleanup_jobs(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
> drm_sched_start_timeout(sched);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched->job_list_lock, flags);
>
> + return NULL;
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -698,12 +700,18 @@ static int drm_sched_main(void *param)
> struct drm_sched_fence *s_fence;
> struct drm_sched_job *sched_job;
> struct dma_fence *fence;
> + struct drm_sched_job *cleanup_job = NULL;
>
> wait_event_interruptible(sched->wake_up_worker,
> - (drm_sched_cleanup_jobs(sched),
> + (cleanup_job = drm_sched_get_cleanup_job(sched)) ||
> (!drm_sched_blocked(sched) &&
> (entity = drm_sched_select_entity(sched))) ||
> - kthread_should_stop()));
> + kthread_should_stop());
> +
> + while (cleanup_job) {
> + sched->ops->free_job(cleanup_job);
> + cleanup_job = drm_sched_get_cleanup_job(sched);
> + }
>
> if (!entity)
> continue;
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list