[PATCH V2 5/8] mdev: introduce device specific ops
Jason Wang
jasowang at redhat.com
Fri Sep 27 08:04:25 UTC 2019
On 2019/9/25 下午10:11, Rob Miller wrote:
>
> > > mdev_set_class_id(mdev, MDEV_ID_VFIO);
> > > + mdev_set_dev_ops(mdev, &intel_vfio_vgpu_dev_ops);
> >
> > This seems rather unrefined. We're registering interdependent data in
> > separate calls. All drivers need to make both of these calls. I'm not
> > sure if this is a good idea, but what if we had:
> >
> > static const struct vfio_mdev_device_ops intel_vfio_vgpu_dev_ops = {
> > .id = MDEV_ID_VFIO,
> > .open = intel_vgpu_open,
> > .release = intel_vgpu_release,
> > ...
> >
> > And the set function passed &intel_vfio_vgpu_dev_ops.id
> <http://intel_vfio_vgpu_dev_ops.id> and the mdev
> > bus drivers used container_of to get to their callbacks?
>
> or just make it explicit? e.g.
>
> mdev_set_class(mdev, MDEV_ID_VFIO, &intel_vfio_vgpu_dev_ops);
Yes, this seems even better.
Will do this in V3.
Thanks
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list