[PATCH 2/2] drm/panfrost: Use coherent pagetable walk on Juno

Rob Herring robh at kernel.org
Mon Sep 30 17:52:36 UTC 2019


On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 11:26 AM Steven Price <steven.price at arm.com> wrote:
>
> On 30/09/2019 16:24, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > Although going full "dma-coherent" ends badly due to GEM objects still
> > being forcibly mapped non-cacheable, we can at least take advantage of
> > Juno's ACE-lite integration to skip cache maintenance for pagetables.
> >
> > CC: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
> > CC: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso at collabora.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy at arm.com>
> > ---
> >
> > This isn't really meant as a series, I'm just sending it together
> > with patch #1 for context.
> >
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_mmu.c | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_mmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_mmu.c
> > index bdd990568476..560439f63277 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_mmu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_mmu.c
> > @@ -365,6 +365,9 @@ int panfrost_mmu_pgtable_alloc(struct panfrost_file_priv *priv)
> >               .iommu_dev      = pfdev->dev,
> >       };
> >
> > +     if (of_device_is_compatible(pfdev->dev->of_node, "arm,juno-mali"))
> > +             pfdev->mmu->pgtbl_cfg.coherent_walk = true;
>
> Should be:
>         mmu->pgtbl_cfg.coherent_walk = true;

IOW, base this on 5.4 or drm-misc-next.

> Also I'm not sure whether we should do this based on a compatible
> string. kbase has a "system-coherency" device-tree flag for it. In
> theory we could end up with a long list of compatibles here...

Why not use 'dma-coherent' which you set? If not, I'm confused as to
what 'dma-coherent' is supposed to mean. Is it possible for page table
walks to have different coherency than the rest of the accesses?

Rob


More information about the dri-devel mailing list