[PATCH V4 1/4] backlight: qcom-wled: convert the wled bindings to .yaml format

[Daniel Thompson]

On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 04:45:49PM +0530, kgunda at codeaurora.org wrote:
> On 2020-03-31 23:24, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 11:16:55PM +0530, Kiran Gunda wrote:
> > > diff --git
> > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/qcom-wled.yaml
> > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/qcom-wled.yaml
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..8a388bf
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/qcom-wled.yaml
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,184 @@
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > > +%YAML 1.2
> > > +---
> > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/leds/backlight/qcom-wled.yaml#
> > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > > +
> > > +title: Binding for Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. WLED driver
> > > +
> > > +maintainers:
> > > +  - Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org>
> > 
> > Should be the h/w owner (you), not who applies patches.
> > 
> will address in next post.
> <snip>
> will address in next post.
> <snip>
> will address in next post.
> <snip>
> will address in next post.
> <snip>
> will address in next post.
> <snip>
> will address in next post.
> <snip>
> will address in next post.
> <snip>
> will address in next post.
> <snip>
> will address in next post.

If you agree on all points raised I doubt there is any need for a point
by point reply since everyone who reads it will have to scroll down
simply to find out that you agree on all points.

Better just to acknowledge the feedback and reply to the first one
saying you'll agree on all points and will address all feedback in the
next revision (and then trim the reply to keep it short).


Daniel.