[PATCH v5 1/5] PM / EM: add devices to Energy Model

[Daniel Lezcano]

Hi Lukasz,


On 18/03/2020 12:45, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> Add support of other devices into the Energy Model framework not only the
> CPUs. Change the interface to be more unified which can handle other
> devices as well.

thanks for taking care of that. Overall I like the changes in this patch
but it hard to review in details because the patch is too big :/

Could you split this patch into smaller ones?

eg. (at your convenience)

 - One patch renaming s/cap/perf/

 - One patch adding a new function:

    em_dev_register_perf_domain(struct device *dev,
				unsigned int nr_states,
				struct em_data_callback *cb);

   (+ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL)

    And em_register_perf_domain() using it.

 - One converting the em_register_perf_domain() user to
	em_dev_register_perf_domain

 - One adding the different new 'em' functions

 - And finally one removing em_register_perf_domain().


> Acked-by: Quentin Perret <qperret at google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba at arm.com>
> ---

[ ... ]

>  2. Core APIs
> @@ -70,14 +72,16 @@ CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL must be enabled to use the EM framework.
>  Drivers are expected to register performance domains into the EM framework by
>  calling the following API::
>  
> -  int em_register_perf_domain(cpumask_t *span, unsigned int nr_states,
> -			      struct em_data_callback *cb);
> +  int em_register_perf_domain(struct device *dev, unsigned int nr_states,
> +		struct em_data_callback *cb, cpumask_t *cpus);

Isn't possible to get rid of this cpumask by using
cpufreq_cpu_get() which returns the cpufreq's policy and from their get
the related cpus ?

[ ... ]


-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog