[PATCH v4 2/3] drm/tegra: output: Support DRM bridges
Laurent Pinchart
laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com
Fri Apr 17 19:30:18 UTC 2020
Hi Dmitry,
Thank you for the patch.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 08:52:37PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Newer Tegra device-trees will specify a video output graph which involves
> a bridge. This patch adds initial support for the DRM bridges to the
> Tegra's DRM output.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx at gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.h | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/output.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.h
> index 804869799305..cccd368b6752 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> #include <linux/of_gpio.h>
>
> #include <drm/drm_atomic.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_bridge.h>
You could add a forward declaration of struct drm_bridge instead, that
can lower the compilation time a little bit.
> #include <drm/drm_edid.h>
> #include <drm/drm_encoder.h>
> #include <drm/drm_fb_helper.h>
> @@ -116,6 +117,7 @@ struct tegra_output {
> struct device_node *of_node;
> struct device *dev;
>
> + struct drm_bridge *bridge;
> struct drm_panel *panel;
> struct i2c_adapter *ddc;
> const struct edid *edid;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/output.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/output.c
> index a6a711d54e88..ec0cd4a1ced1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/output.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/output.c
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_of.h>
> #include <drm/drm_panel.h>
> #include <drm/drm_simple_kms_helper.h>
>
> @@ -92,13 +93,23 @@ static irqreturn_t hpd_irq(int irq, void *data)
>
> int tegra_output_probe(struct tegra_output *output)
> {
> - struct device_node *ddc, *panel;
> + struct device_node *ddc, *panel, *port;
> unsigned long flags;
> int err, size;
>
> if (!output->of_node)
> output->of_node = output->dev->of_node;
>
> + port = of_get_child_by_name(output->of_node, "port");
Do you need to check for the presence of a port node first ? Can you
just check the return value of drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(), and fall
back to "nvidia,panel" if it returns -ENODEV ?
> + if (port) {
> + err = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(output->of_node, 0, 0, NULL,
> + &output->bridge);
> + of_node_put(port);
> +
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> panel = of_parse_phandle(output->of_node, "nvidia,panel", 0);
> if (panel) {
> output->panel = of_drm_find_panel(panel);
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list