[PATCH 4/9] drm/msm/a6xx: HFI v2 for A640 and A650

Jonathan Marek jonathan at marek.ca
Tue Apr 21 16:52:40 UTC 2020


On 4/21/20 12:30 PM, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 10:03:08AM -0400, Jonathan Marek wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek <jonathan at marek.ca>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c |  68 ++++++++++++---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h |   7 ++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c |   6 +-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_hfi.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_hfi.h |  50 ++++++++++-
>>   5 files changed, 224 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
>> index c6ecb3189ec5..dc2d69837110 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
>> @@ -126,8 +126,6 @@ static void __a6xx_gmu_set_freq(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, int index)
>>   	if (ret)
>>   		dev_err(gmu->dev, "GMU set GPU frequency error: %d\n", ret);
>>   
>> -	gmu->freq = gmu->gpu_freqs[index];
>> -
>>   	/*
>>   	 * Eventually we will want to scale the path vote with the frequency but
>>   	 * for now leave it at max so that the performance is nominal.
>> @@ -151,7 +149,12 @@ void a6xx_gmu_set_freq(struct msm_gpu *gpu, unsigned long freq)
>>   
>>   	gmu->current_perf_index = perf_index;
>>   
>> -	__a6xx_gmu_set_freq(gmu, perf_index);
>> +	if (gmu->legacy)
>> +		__a6xx_gmu_set_freq(gmu, perf_index);
>> +	else
>> +		a6xx_hfi_set_freq(gmu, perf_index);
> 
> Welcome to the first great GMU schism. There are going to be a lot of these if()
> statements and my guess is that it won't get any cleaner in the future.
> 
> The best option in my opinion would be to make two separate GMU implementations
> and select the probe either from the gpu list or the compatible string and use
> function pointers for the functions that are called from a6xx_gpu.c and
> a6xx_gpu_state.c.
> 
> We _could_ make the gmu->legacy thing work but if someday there is a another
> schism we would be sad that we didn't do the ground work now.
> 
> We could also do the same for HFI, but I think there is a bit less of a delta
> there and there isn't a harm in having a _v1 function or two laying around.
> 

I don't think it makes sense to have two separate GMU implementations at 
this point, most of the code is still sharable. There's "only" 10 of 
these gmu->legacy if()s in the final version, and they are very small if()s.

>> +
>> +	gmu->freq = gmu->gpu_freqs[perf_index];
>>   }
>>   
>>   unsigned long a6xx_gmu_get_freq(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>> @@ -231,19 +234,26 @@ int a6xx_gmu_set_oob(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, enum a6xx_gmu_oob_state state)
>>   
>>   	switch (state) {
>>   	case GMU_OOB_GPU_SET:
>> -		request = GMU_OOB_GPU_SET_REQUEST;
>> -		ack = GMU_OOB_GPU_SET_ACK;
>> +		if (gmu->legacy) {
>> +			request = GMU_OOB_GPU_SET_REQUEST;
>> +			ack = GMU_OOB_GPU_SET_ACK;
>> +		} else {
>> +			request = GMU_OOB_GPU_SET_REQUEST_NEW;
>> +			ack = GMU_OOB_GPU_SET_ACK_NEW;
>> +		}
>>   		name = "GPU_SET";
>>   		break;
>>   	case GMU_OOB_BOOT_SLUMBER:
>>   		request = GMU_OOB_BOOT_SLUMBER_REQUEST;
>>   		ack = GMU_OOB_BOOT_SLUMBER_ACK;
>>   		name = "BOOT_SLUMBER";
>> +		WARN_ON(!gmu->legacy);
> 
> This is unlikely to be the case - these should only be called from within the
> GMU code and we should be able to control it.
> 

These are called from a6xx_gpu.c too, not just from within a6xx_gmu.c. 
IMO the warnings might be useful to catch errors in the future, but they 
not absolutely necessary either.

>>   		break;
>>   	case GMU_OOB_DCVS_SET:
>>   		request = GMU_OOB_DCVS_REQUEST;
>>   		ack = GMU_OOB_DCVS_ACK;
>>   		name = "GPU_DCVS";
>> +		WARN_ON(!gmu->legacy);
> 
> Same.
> 
>>   		break;
>>   	default:
>>   		return -EINVAL;
>> @@ -271,6 +281,13 @@ int a6xx_gmu_set_oob(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, enum a6xx_gmu_oob_state state)
>>   /* Clear a pending OOB state in the GMU */
>>   void a6xx_gmu_clear_oob(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, enum a6xx_gmu_oob_state state)
>>   {
>> +	if (!gmu->legacy) {
>> +		WARN_ON(state != GMU_OOB_GPU_SET);
>> +		gmu_write(gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_HOST2GMU_INTR_SET,
>> +			1 << GMU_OOB_GPU_SET_CLEAR_NEW);
>> +		return;
>> +	}
> 
> A good example of the usefulness of per-implementation functions.
> 

I wouldn't say its a great example, the function is effectively the 
same, just with a different shift value. It was just simple enough that 
it felt better to do it this way.

>> +
>>   	switch (state) {
>>   	case GMU_OOB_GPU_SET:
>>   		gmu_write(gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_HOST2GMU_INTR_SET,
>> @@ -293,6 +310,9 @@ static int a6xx_sptprac_enable(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu)
>>   	int ret;
>>   	u32 val;
>>   
>> +	if (!gmu->legacy)
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>>   	gmu_write(gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_GX_SPTPRAC_POWER_CONTROL, 0x778000);
>>   
>>   	ret = gmu_poll_timeout(gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_SPTPRAC_PWR_CLK_STATUS, val,
>> @@ -312,6 +332,9 @@ static void a6xx_sptprac_disable(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu)
>>   	u32 val;
>>   	int ret;
>>   
>> +	if (!gmu->legacy)
>> +		return;
>> +
>>   	/* Make sure retention is on */
>>   	gmu_rmw(gmu, REG_A6XX_GPU_CC_GX_GDSCR, 0, (1 << 11));
>>   
>> @@ -355,6 +378,11 @@ static int a6xx_gmu_notify_slumber(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu)
>>   	if (gmu->idle_level < GMU_IDLE_STATE_SPTP)
>>   		a6xx_sptprac_disable(gmu);
>>   
>> +	if (!gmu->legacy) {
>> +		ret = a6xx_hfi_send_prep_slumber(gmu);
>> +		goto out;
>> +	}
>> +
>>   	/* Tell the GMU to get ready to slumber */
>>   	gmu_write(gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_BOOT_SLUMBER_OPTION, 1);
>>   
>> @@ -370,6 +398,7 @@ static int a6xx_gmu_notify_slumber(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu)
>>   		}
>>   	}
>>   
>> +out:
>>   	/* Put fence into allow mode */
>>   	gmu_write(gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_AO_AHB_FENCE_CTRL, 0);
>>   	return ret;
>> @@ -639,9 +668,11 @@ static int a6xx_gmu_fw_start(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, unsigned int state)
>>   	if (ret)
>>   		return ret;
>>   
>> -	ret = a6xx_gmu_gfx_rail_on(gmu);
>> -	if (ret)
>> -		return ret;
>> +	if (gmu->legacy) {
>> +		ret = a6xx_gmu_gfx_rail_on(gmu);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			return ret;
>> +	}
>>   
>>   	/* Enable SPTP_PC if the CPU is responsible for it */
>>   	if (gmu->idle_level < GMU_IDLE_STATE_SPTP) {
>> @@ -760,7 +791,10 @@ int a6xx_gmu_resume(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu)
>>   	enable_irq(gmu->hfi_irq);
>>   
>>   	/* Set the GPU to the current freq */
>> -	__a6xx_gmu_set_freq(gmu, gmu->current_perf_index);
>> +	if (gmu->legacy)
>> +		__a6xx_gmu_set_freq(gmu, gmu->current_perf_index);
>> +	else
>> +		a6xx_hfi_set_freq(gmu, gmu->current_perf_index);
>>   
>>   	/*
>>   	 * "enable" the GX power domain which won't actually do anything but it
>> @@ -1305,6 +1339,7 @@ void a6xx_gmu_remove(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu)
>>   
>>   int a6xx_gmu_init(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, struct device_node *node)
>>   {
>> +	struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = &a6xx_gpu->base;
>>   	struct a6xx_gmu *gmu = &a6xx_gpu->gmu;
>>   	struct platform_device *pdev = of_find_device_by_node(node);
>>   	int ret;
>> @@ -1331,16 +1366,21 @@ int a6xx_gmu_init(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, struct device_node *node)
>>   	if (ret)
>>   		goto err_put_device;
>>   
>> +	if (!adreno_is_a640(adreno_gpu) && !adreno_is_a650(adreno_gpu)) {
>> +		/* HFI v1, no sptprac */
> 
> This comment isn't accurate, 630 and 618 have sptprac, 640 and 650 do not need
> it.
> 

Right, this comment is wrong.

>> +		gmu->legacy = true;
>> +
>> +		/* Allocate memory for the GMU debug region */
>> +		gmu->debug = a6xx_gmu_memory_alloc(gmu, SZ_16K, 0);
>> +		if (IS_ERR(gmu->debug))
>> +			goto err_memory;
>> +	}
>> +
>>   	/* Allocate memory for for the HFI queues */
>>   	gmu->hfi = a6xx_gmu_memory_alloc(gmu, SZ_16K, 0);
>>   	if (IS_ERR(gmu->hfi))
>>   		goto err_memory;
>>   
>> -	/* Allocate memory for the GMU debug region */
>> -	gmu->debug = a6xx_gmu_memory_alloc(gmu, SZ_16K, 0);
>> -	if (IS_ERR(gmu->debug))
>> -		goto err_memory;
>> -
>>   	/* Map the GMU registers */
>>   	gmu->mmio = a6xx_gmu_get_mmio(pdev, "gmu");
>>   	if (IS_ERR(gmu->mmio))
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h
>> index 2af91ed7ed0c..781714ffaa91 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h
>> @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ struct a6xx_gmu {
>>   
>>   	bool initialized;
>>   	bool hung;
>> +	bool legacy; /* a618 or a630 */
>>   };
>>   
>>   static inline u32 gmu_read(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, u32 offset)
>> @@ -160,10 +161,16 @@ enum a6xx_gmu_oob_state {
>>   #define GMU_OOB_GPU_SET_ACK	24
>>   #define GMU_OOB_GPU_SET_CLEAR	24
>>   
>> +#define GMU_OOB_GPU_SET_REQUEST_NEW	30
>> +#define GMU_OOB_GPU_SET_ACK_NEW		31
>> +#define GMU_OOB_GPU_SET_CLEAR_NEW	31
>> +
>>   
>>   void a6xx_hfi_init(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu);
>>   int a6xx_hfi_start(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, int boot_state);
>>   void a6xx_hfi_stop(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu);
>> +int a6xx_hfi_send_prep_slumber(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu);
>> +int a6xx_hfi_set_freq(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, int index);
>>   
>>   bool a6xx_gmu_gx_is_on(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu);
>>   bool a6xx_gmu_sptprac_is_on(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
>> index 68af24150de5..a860d4970e10 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
>> @@ -566,8 +566,10 @@ static int a6xx_hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>   	 */
>>   	a6xx_gmu_clear_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_GPU_SET);
>>   
>> -	/* Take the GMU out of its special boot mode */
>> -	a6xx_gmu_clear_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_BOOT_SLUMBER);
>> +	if (a6xx_gpu->gmu.legacy) {
>> +		/* Take the GMU out of its special boot mode */
>> +		a6xx_gmu_clear_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_BOOT_SLUMBER);
>> +	}
>>   
>>   	return ret;
>>   }
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_hfi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_hfi.c
>> index e450e0b97211..3d4b142d8fb3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_hfi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_hfi.c
>> @@ -17,10 +17,14 @@ static const char * const a6xx_hfi_msg_id[] = {
>>   	HFI_MSG_ID(HFI_H2F_MSG_BW_TABLE),
>>   	HFI_MSG_ID(HFI_H2F_MSG_PERF_TABLE),
>>   	HFI_MSG_ID(HFI_H2F_MSG_TEST),
>> +	HFI_MSG_ID(HFI_H2F_MSG_START),
>> +	HFI_MSG_ID(HFI_H2F_MSG_CORE_FW_START),
>> +	HFI_MSG_ID(HFI_H2F_MSG_GX_BW_PERF_VOTE),
>> +	HFI_MSG_ID(HFI_H2F_MSG_PREPARE_SLUMBER),
>>   };
>>   
>> -static int a6xx_hfi_queue_read(struct a6xx_hfi_queue *queue, u32 *data,
>> -		u32 dwords)
>> +static int a6xx_hfi_queue_read(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu,
>> +	struct a6xx_hfi_queue *queue, u32 *data, u32 dwords)
>>   {
>>   	struct a6xx_hfi_queue_header *header = queue->header;
>>   	u32 i, hdr, index = header->read_index;
>> @@ -48,6 +52,9 @@ static int a6xx_hfi_queue_read(struct a6xx_hfi_queue *queue, u32 *data,
>>   		index = (index + 1) % header->size;
>>   	}
>>   
>> +	if (!gmu->legacy)
>> +		index = ALIGN(index, 4) % header->size;
>> +
>>   	header->read_index = index;
>>   	return HFI_HEADER_SIZE(hdr);
>>   }
>> @@ -73,6 +80,12 @@ static int a6xx_hfi_queue_write(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu,
>>   		index = (index + 1) % header->size;
>>   	}
>>   
>> +	/* Cookify any non used data at the end of the write buffer */
>> +	if (!gmu->legacy) {
>> +		for (; index % 4; index = (index + 1) % header->size)
>> +			queue->data[index] = 0xfafafafa;
>> +	}
>> +
>>   	header->write_index = index;
>>   	spin_unlock(&queue->lock);
>>   
>> @@ -106,7 +119,7 @@ static int a6xx_hfi_wait_for_ack(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, u32 id, u32 seqnum,
>>   		struct a6xx_hfi_msg_response resp;
>>   
>>   		/* Get the next packet */
>> -		ret = a6xx_hfi_queue_read(queue, (u32 *) &resp,
>> +		ret = a6xx_hfi_queue_read(gmu, queue, (u32 *) &resp,
>>   			sizeof(resp) >> 2);
>>   
>>   		/* If the queue is empty our response never made it */
>> @@ -195,6 +208,28 @@ static int a6xx_hfi_get_fw_version(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, u32 *version)
>>   		version, sizeof(*version));
>>   }
>>   
>> +static int a6xx_hfi_send_perf_table_v1(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu)
>> +{
>> +	struct a6xx_hfi_msg_perf_table_v1 msg = { 0 };
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	msg.num_gpu_levels = gmu->nr_gpu_freqs;
>> +	msg.num_gmu_levels = gmu->nr_gmu_freqs;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < gmu->nr_gpu_freqs; i++) {
>> +		msg.gx_votes[i].vote = gmu->gx_arc_votes[i];
>> +		msg.gx_votes[i].freq = gmu->gpu_freqs[i] / 1000;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < gmu->nr_gmu_freqs; i++) {
>> +		msg.cx_votes[i].vote = gmu->cx_arc_votes[i];
>> +		msg.cx_votes[i].freq = gmu->gmu_freqs[i] / 1000;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return a6xx_hfi_send_msg(gmu, HFI_H2F_MSG_PERF_TABLE, &msg, sizeof(msg),
>> +		NULL, 0);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int a6xx_hfi_send_perf_table(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu)
>>   {
>>   	struct a6xx_hfi_msg_perf_table msg = { 0 };
>> @@ -205,6 +240,7 @@ static int a6xx_hfi_send_perf_table(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu)
>>   
>>   	for (i = 0; i < gmu->nr_gpu_freqs; i++) {
>>   		msg.gx_votes[i].vote = gmu->gx_arc_votes[i];
>> +		msg.gx_votes[i].acd = 0xffffffff;
>>   		msg.gx_votes[i].freq = gmu->gpu_freqs[i] / 1000;
>>   	}
>>   
>> @@ -306,7 +342,45 @@ static int a6xx_hfi_send_test(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu)
>>   		NULL, 0);
>>   }
>>   
>> -int a6xx_hfi_start(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, int boot_state)
>> +int a6xx_hfi_send_start(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu)
>> +{
>> +	struct a6xx_hfi_msg_start msg = { 0 };
>> +
>> +	return a6xx_hfi_send_msg(gmu, HFI_H2F_MSG_START, &msg, sizeof(msg),
>> +		NULL, 0);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int a6xx_hfi_send_core_fw_start(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu)
>> +{
>> +	struct a6xx_hfi_msg_core_fw_start msg = { 0 };
>> +
>> +	return a6xx_hfi_send_msg(gmu, HFI_H2F_MSG_CORE_FW_START, &msg,
>> +		sizeof(msg), NULL, 0);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int a6xx_hfi_set_freq(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, int index)
>> +{
>> +	struct a6xx_hfi_gx_bw_perf_vote_cmd msg = { 0 };
>> +
>> +	msg.ack_type = 1; /* blocking */
>> +	msg.freq = index;
>> +	msg.bw = 0; /* TODO: bus scaling */
>> +
>> +	return a6xx_hfi_send_msg(gmu, HFI_H2F_MSG_GX_BW_PERF_VOTE, &msg,
>> +		sizeof(msg), NULL, 0);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int a6xx_hfi_send_prep_slumber(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu)
>> +{
>> +	struct a6xx_hfi_prep_slumber_cmd msg = { 0 };
>> +
>> +	/* TODO: should freq and bw fields be non-zero ? */
>> +
>> +	return a6xx_hfi_send_msg(gmu, HFI_H2F_MSG_PREPARE_SLUMBER, &msg,
>> +		sizeof(msg), NULL, 0);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int a6xx_hfi_start_v1(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, int boot_state)
>>   {
>>   	int ret;
>>   
>> @@ -324,7 +398,7 @@ int a6xx_hfi_start(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, int boot_state)
>>   	 * the GMU firmware
>>   	 */
>>   
>> -	ret = a6xx_hfi_send_perf_table(gmu);
>> +	ret = a6xx_hfi_send_perf_table_v1(gmu);
>>   	if (ret)
>>   		return ret;
>>   
>> @@ -341,6 +415,37 @@ int a6xx_hfi_start(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, int boot_state)
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>   
>> +int a6xx_hfi_start(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, int boot_state)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	if (gmu->legacy)
>> +		return a6xx_hfi_start_v1(gmu, boot_state);
>> +
>> +
>> +	ret = a6xx_hfi_send_perf_table(gmu);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	ret = a6xx_hfi_send_bw_table(gmu);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	ret = a6xx_hfi_send_core_fw_start(gmu);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Downstream driver sends this in its "a6xx_hw_init" equivalent,
>> +	 * but seems to be no harm in sending it here
>> +	 */
>> +	ret = a6xx_hfi_send_start(gmu);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>   void a6xx_hfi_stop(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu)
>>   {
>>   	int i;
>> @@ -415,5 +520,5 @@ void a6xx_hfi_init(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu)
>>   	/* GMU response queue */
>>   	offset += SZ_4K;
>>   	a6xx_hfi_queue_init(&gmu->queues[1], &headers[1], hfi->virt + offset,
>> -		hfi->iova + offset, 4);
>> +		hfi->iova + offset, gmu->legacy ? 4 : 1);
>>   }
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_hfi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_hfi.h
>> index 60d1319fa44f..2bd670ca42d6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_hfi.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_hfi.h
>> @@ -51,7 +51,8 @@ struct a6xx_hfi_queue {
>>   /* HFI message types */
>>   
>>   #define HFI_MSG_CMD 0
>> -#define HFI_MSG_ACK 2
>> +#define HFI_MSG_ACK 1
>> +#define HFI_MSG_ACK_V1 2
>>   
>>   #define HFI_F2H_MSG_ACK 126
>>   
>> @@ -94,7 +95,13 @@ struct perf_level {
>>   	u32 freq;
>>   };
>>   
>> -struct a6xx_hfi_msg_perf_table {
>> +struct perf_gx_level {
>> +	u32 vote;
>> +	u32 acd;
>> +	u32 freq;
>> +};
> 
> These all need to be __packed for the usual sad reasons.
> 
>> +
>> +struct a6xx_hfi_msg_perf_table_v1 {
>>   	u32 header;
>>   	u32 num_gpu_levels;
>>   	u32 num_gmu_levels;
>> @@ -103,6 +110,15 @@ struct a6xx_hfi_msg_perf_table {
>>   	struct perf_level cx_votes[4];
>>   };
>>   
>> +struct a6xx_hfi_msg_perf_table {
>> +	u32 header;
>> +	u32 num_gpu_levels;
>> +	u32 num_gmu_levels;
>> +
>> +	struct perf_gx_level gx_votes[16];
>> +	struct perf_level cx_votes[4];
>> +};
>> +
>>   #define HFI_H2F_MSG_BW_TABLE 3
>>   
>>   struct a6xx_hfi_msg_bw_table {
>> @@ -124,4 +140,34 @@ struct a6xx_hfi_msg_test {
>>   	u32 header;
>>   };
>>   
>> +#define HFI_H2F_MSG_START 10
>> +
>> +struct a6xx_hfi_msg_start {
>> +	u32 header;
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define HFI_H2F_MSG_CORE_FW_START 14
>> +
>> +struct a6xx_hfi_msg_core_fw_start {
>> +	u32 header;
>> +	u32 handle;
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define HFI_H2F_MSG_GX_BW_PERF_VOTE 30
>> +
>> +struct a6xx_hfi_gx_bw_perf_vote_cmd {
>> +	u32 header;
>> +	u32 ack_type;
>> +	u32 freq;
>> +	u32 bw;
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define HFI_H2F_MSG_PREPARE_SLUMBER 33
>> +
>> +struct a6xx_hfi_prep_slumber_cmd {
>> +	u32 header;
>> +	u32 bw;
>> +	u32 freq;
>> +};
>> +
>>   #endif
>> -- 
>> 2.26.1
>>
> 


More information about the dri-devel mailing list