Aw: Re: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] arm: dts: mt7623: add display subsystem related device nodes
David Woodhouse
dwmw2 at infradead.org
Wed Aug 5 08:36:27 UTC 2020
On Wed, 2020-08-05 at 09:27 +0200, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> or should we split dtsi to have a common part (mt7623.dtsi), and one for
> soc (mt7623n.dtsi/mt7623a.dtsi)?
>
> mt7623.dtsi => mt7623n.dtsi => mt7623n-bananapi-bpi-r2.dts
> mt7623.dtsi => mt7623a.dtsi => mt7623a-unielec-u7623.dts (not existing yet,
> openwrt seems to use a board-specific dtsi)
Yes, I think we should.
I'll create mt7623a.dtsi and upstream the U7623 support; I think that
can happen without conflicting with anything you do.
I note that the GPU node has been added to mt7623.dtsi in 5.8 too;
that'll want to move to the new mt7623n.dtsi that you create, along
with your other new additions.
Does that seem reasonable?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5174 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20200805/181f0b07/attachment.bin>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list