[PATCH v5 00/14] Add regulator devfreq support to Panfrost

[Rob Herring]

On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 6:21 AM Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 06:30:05PM +0200, Clément Péron wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 Aug 2020 at 18:28, Clément Péron <peron.clem at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Rob,
> > >
> > > On Fri, 7 Aug 2020 at 18:13, Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 3:54 AM Clément Péron <peron.clem at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > This serie cleans and adds regulator support to Panfrost devfreq.
> > > > > This is mostly based on comment for the freshly introduced lima
> > > > > devfreq.
> > > > >
> > > > > We need to add regulator support because on Allwinner the GPU OPP
> > > > > table defines both frequencies and voltages.
> > > > >
> > > > > First patches [01-07] should not change the actual behavior
> > > > > and introduce a proper panfrost_devfreq struct.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Clément
> > > > >
> > > > > Changes since v4:
> > > > >  - Fix missed a pfdev to &pfdev->devfreq during rebase
> > > > >
> > > > > Changes since v3:
> > > > >  - Collect Steven Price reviewed-by tags
> > > > >  - Rebase on next/master (next-20200709)
> > > > >
> > > > > Changes since v2:
> > > > >  - Collect Alyssa Rosenzweig reviewed-by tags
> > > > >  - Fix opp_set_regulator before adding opp_table (introduce in v2)
> > > > >  - Call err_fini in case opp_add_table failed
> > > > >
> > > > > Changes since v1:
> > > > >  - Collect Steven Price reviewed-by tags
> > > > >  - Fix spinlock comment
> > > > >  - Drop OPP clock-name patch
> > > > >  - Drop device_property_test patch
> > > > >  - Add rename error labels patch
> > > > >
> > > > > Clément Péron (14):
> > > > >   drm/panfrost: avoid static declaration
> > > > >   drm/panfrost: clean headers in devfreq
> > > > >   drm/panfrost: don't use pfdevfreq.busy_count to know if hw is idle
> > > > >   drm/panfrost: introduce panfrost_devfreq struct
> > > > >   drm/panfrost: use spinlock instead of atomic
> > > > >   drm/panfrost: properly handle error in probe
> > > > >   drm/panfrost: rename error labels in device_init
> > > > >   drm/panfrost: move devfreq_init()/fini() in device
> > > > >   drm/panfrost: dynamically alloc regulators
> > > > >   drm/panfrost: add regulators to devfreq
> > > > >   arm64: defconfig: Enable devfreq cooling device
> > > > >   arm64: dts: allwinner: h6: Add cooling map for GPU
> > > > >   [DO NOT MERGE] arm64: dts: allwinner: h6: Add GPU OPP table
> > > > >   [DO NOT MERGE] arm64: dts: allwinner: force GPU regulator to be always
> > > >
> > > > Patches 1-10 applied to drm-misc.
> > >
> > > This serie has been superseded by v5.
> > >
> > > Could you apply the v5 instead.
> >
> > Oups forget my email
> >
> > I got an issue with my gmail...
>
> drm-misc is a non-rebasing tree (because it's got lots of
> maintainers/committers). Which means we need fixup patches now.
>
> Not that currently drm-misc-next isn't in linux-next because of the merge
> window, so just rebasing on top of linux-next wont work (at least not
> until -rc1 is out). You can get the tree here meanwhile:
>
> https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc/

I applied v5 so there's nothing to do. The gmail issue was gmail put
v4 and v5 in the same conversion (under v4) which it likes to do
somewhat randomly and with no regard to actual threading. :(

Rob