[PATCH] drm/amdgpu/dc: Simplify drm_crtc_state::active checks

Michel Dänzer michel at daenzer.net
Wed Aug 19 09:08:04 UTC 2020


On 2020-07-22 7:12 p.m., Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 10:25 AM Michel Dänzer <michel at daenzer.net> wrote:
>> On 2020-07-22 3:10 p.m., Kazlauskas, Nicholas wrote:
>>> On 2020-07-22 8:51 a.m., Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 2:38 PM Michel Dänzer <michel at daenzer.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Michel Dänzer <mdaenzer at redhat.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> drm_atomic_crtc_check enforces that ::active can only be true if
>>>>> ::enable is as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <mdaenzer at redhat.com>
>>>
>>> Looks fine to me. The check is sufficiently old enough that I don't mind
>>> relying on the core for this either.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas at amd.com>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> modeset vs modereset is a bit an inglorious name choice ... since this
>>>> seems to be glue code and not part of core dc, maybe rename to
>>>> enable_required/disable_required to keep it consistent with the
>>>> wording atomic helpers use? DC also seems to use reset for a lot of
>>>> other things already (state reset, like atomic, or gpu reset like
>>>> drm/scheduler's td_r_), so I think this would also help clarity from a
>>>> DC perspective.
>>>>
>>>> Patch itself is good, above just an idea for another patch on top.
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
>>
>> Thanks for the reviews! I assume this will get picked up by a DC
>> developer or Alex/Christian.
> 
> Applied.  Thanks!

Thank you. Can't see it in the DRM changes for 5.9 though.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer               |               https://redhat.com
Libre software enthusiast             |             Mesa and X developer


More information about the dri-devel mailing list