[PATCH RFC v6 1/6] dt-bindings: display: add Unisoc's drm master bindings

[Sam Ravnborg]

Hi Kevin.

> >
> > Any specific reason why this is not a ports node like used by many other
> > display bindings?
> > In other words - I think this is too simple.
> We only support one display pipeline now, other interface, like
> DP(DisplayPort), HDMI...will be add later...
> 
>   ports:
>     $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
>     description: |
>       Should contain a list of phandles pointing to display interface port
>       of dpu devices.. dpu definitions as defined in
>       Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/sprd/sprd,dpu.yaml

There is nothing wrong having a ports node that is limited to a single
port node. But please remember the binding describes the HW - so if the
HW supports more than one port the binding should describe this.
What the driver supports is not relevant for the binding.

	Sam