[RFC PATCH 2/6] drm/radeon: don't use ttm bo->offset
Christian König
christian.koenig at amd.com
Thu Feb 13 12:18:09 UTC 2020
Looks like most of the patch is missing?
We should have quite a number of uses of the BO offset in radeon or do
all of those go through radeon_bo_gpu_offset?
If yes then the change is much smaller than I thought i needs to be.
Christian.
Am 13.02.20 um 13:01 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das at amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c | 4 +---
> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
> index d59b004f6695..97cfcc2870af 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
> @@ -2823,6 +2823,7 @@ extern void radeon_ttm_set_active_vram_size(struct radeon_device *rdev, u64 size
> extern void radeon_program_register_sequence(struct radeon_device *rdev,
> const u32 *registers,
> const u32 array_size);
> +struct radeon_device *radeon_get_rdev(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev);
>
> /*
> * vm
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h
> index d23f2ed4126e..4d37571c7ff5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h
> @@ -90,7 +90,21 @@ static inline void radeon_bo_unreserve(struct radeon_bo *bo)
> */
> static inline u64 radeon_bo_gpu_offset(struct radeon_bo *bo)
> {
> - return bo->tbo.offset;
> + struct radeon_device *rdev;
> + u64 start = 0;
> +
> + rdev = radeon_get_rdev(bo->tbo.bdev);
> +
> + switch(bo->tbo.mem.mem_type) {
> + case TTM_PL_TT:
> + start = rdev->mc.gtt_start;
> + break;
> + case TTM_PL_VRAM:
> + start = rdev->mc.vram_start;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return (bo->tbo.mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) + start;
> }
>
> static inline unsigned long radeon_bo_size(struct radeon_bo *bo)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c
> index 098bc9f40b98..b10654494262 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c
> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
> static int radeon_ttm_debugfs_init(struct radeon_device *rdev);
> static void radeon_ttm_debugfs_fini(struct radeon_device *rdev);
>
> -static struct radeon_device *radeon_get_rdev(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev)
> +struct radeon_device *radeon_get_rdev(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev)
> {
> struct radeon_mman *mman;
> struct radeon_device *rdev;
> @@ -87,7 +87,6 @@ static int radeon_init_mem_type(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, uint32_t type,
> break;
> case TTM_PL_TT:
> man->func = &ttm_bo_manager_func;
> - man->gpu_offset = rdev->mc.gtt_start;
> man->available_caching = TTM_PL_MASK_CACHING;
> man->default_caching = TTM_PL_FLAG_CACHED;
> man->flags = TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_MAPPABLE | TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_CMA;
> @@ -109,7 +108,6 @@ static int radeon_init_mem_type(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, uint32_t type,
> case TTM_PL_VRAM:
> /* "On-card" video ram */
> man->func = &ttm_bo_manager_func;
> - man->gpu_offset = rdev->mc.vram_start;
> man->flags = TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_FIXED |
> TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_MAPPABLE;
> man->available_caching = TTM_PL_FLAG_UNCACHED | TTM_PL_FLAG_WC;
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list