[PATCHv2 08/56] drm/omap: panel-dsi-cm: convert to transfer API
Sebastian Reichel
sre at kernel.org
Wed Feb 26 22:12:06 UTC 2020
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 04:52:21PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 12:20:38AM +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > This converts the panel-dsi-cm driver to use the transfer
> > API instead of specific functions, so that the specific
> > functions can be unexported and squashed into the generic
> > transfer function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel at collabora.com>
> > ---
> > .../gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-dsi-cm.c | 133 +++++++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 96 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-dsi-cm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-dsi-cm.c
> > index e6ebfc35243e..92f510a771fe 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-dsi-cm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-dsi-cm.c
> > @@ -140,45 +140,61 @@ static void hw_guard_wait(struct panel_drv_data *ddata)
> > static int dsicm_dcs_read_1(struct panel_drv_data *ddata, u8 dcs_cmd, u8 *data)
> > {
> > struct omap_dss_device *src = ddata->src;
> > - int r;
> > - u8 buf[1];
> > -
> > - r = src->ops->dsi.dcs_read(src, ddata->channel, dcs_cmd, buf, 1);
> > -
> > - if (r < 0)
> > - return r;
> > -
> > - *data = buf[0];
> > + const struct mipi_dsi_msg msg = {
> > + .channel = ddata->channel,
> > + .type = MIPI_DSI_DCS_READ,
> > + .tx_len = 1,
> > + .tx_buf = &dcs_cmd,
> > + .rx_len = 1,
> > + .rx_buf = data
> > + };
> >
> > - return 0;
> > + return src->ops->dsi.transfer(src, &msg);
> > }
> >
> > static int dsicm_dcs_write_0(struct panel_drv_data *ddata, u8 dcs_cmd)
> > {
> > struct omap_dss_device *src = ddata->src;
> > + const struct mipi_dsi_msg msg = {
> > + .channel = ddata->channel,
> > + .type = MIPI_DSI_DCS_SHORT_WRITE,
> > + .tx_buf = &dcs_cmd,
> > + .tx_len = 1,
> > + };
> >
> > - return src->ops->dsi.dcs_write(src, ddata->channel, &dcs_cmd, 1);
> > + return src->ops->dsi.transfer(src, &msg);
> > }
> >
> > static int dsicm_dcs_write_1(struct panel_drv_data *ddata, u8 dcs_cmd, u8 param)
> > {
> > struct omap_dss_device *src = ddata->src;
> > - u8 buf[2] = { dcs_cmd, param };
> > + const u8 buf[] = { dcs_cmd, param };
> > + const struct mipi_dsi_msg msg = {
> > + .channel = ddata->channel,
> > + .type = MIPI_DSI_DCS_SHORT_WRITE_PARAM,
> > + .tx_buf = &buf,
> > + .tx_len = 2,
> > + };
> >
> > - return src->ops->dsi.dcs_write(src, ddata->channel, buf, 2);
> > + return src->ops->dsi.transfer(src, &msg);
> > }
> >
> > static int dsicm_sleep_in(struct panel_drv_data *ddata)
> >
> > {
> > struct omap_dss_device *src = ddata->src;
> > - u8 cmd;
> > int r;
> > + const u8 cmd = MIPI_DCS_ENTER_SLEEP_MODE;
> > + const struct mipi_dsi_msg msg = {
> > + .channel = ddata->channel,
> > + .type = MIPI_DSI_DCS_SHORT_WRITE,
> > + .tx_buf = &cmd,
> > + .tx_len = 1,
> > + };
> >
> > hw_guard_wait(ddata);
> >
> > - cmd = MIPI_DCS_ENTER_SLEEP_MODE;
> > - r = src->ops->dsi.dcs_write_nosync(src, ddata->channel, &cmd, 1);
> > + r = src->ops->dsi.transfer(src, &msg);
>
> Should you call dsicm_dcs_write_0(ddata, MIPI_DCS_ENTER_SLEEP_MODE)
> instead ? This uses the _nosync variant though, is it an issue ?
Right, this will be replaced by mipi_dsi_dcs_enter_sleep_mode() in
a future patch. I did not notice any issues with commands not being
send when panel is turned off, so it should be fine.
> > if (r)
> > return r;
> >
> > @@ -233,28 +249,44 @@ static int dsicm_set_update_window(struct panel_drv_data *ddata,
> > u16 y1 = y;
> > u16 y2 = y + h - 1;
> >
> > - u8 buf[5];
> > - buf[0] = MIPI_DCS_SET_COLUMN_ADDRESS;
> > - buf[1] = (x1 >> 8) & 0xff;
> > - buf[2] = (x1 >> 0) & 0xff;
> > - buf[3] = (x2 >> 8) & 0xff;
> > - buf[4] = (x2 >> 0) & 0xff;
> > + const u8 paramX[] = {
> > + MIPI_DCS_SET_COLUMN_ADDRESS,
> > + (x1 >> 8) & 0xff,
> > + (x1 >> 0) & 0xff,
> > + (x2 >> 8) & 0xff,
> > + (x2 >> 0) & 0xff,
> > + };
> >
> > - r = src->ops->dsi.dcs_write_nosync(src, ddata->channel, buf, sizeof(buf));
> > - if (r)
> > - return r;
> > + const struct mipi_dsi_msg msgX = {
> > + .channel = ddata->channel,
> > + .type = MIPI_DSI_GENERIC_LONG_WRITE,
> > + .tx_buf = paramX,
> > + .tx_len = 5,
> > + };
> >
> > - buf[0] = MIPI_DCS_SET_PAGE_ADDRESS;
> > - buf[1] = (y1 >> 8) & 0xff;
> > - buf[2] = (y1 >> 0) & 0xff;
> > - buf[3] = (y2 >> 8) & 0xff;
> > - buf[4] = (y2 >> 0) & 0xff;
> > + const u8 paramY[] = {
> > + MIPI_DCS_SET_PAGE_ADDRESS,
> > + (y1 >> 8) & 0xff,
> > + (y1 >> 0) & 0xff,
> > + (y2 >> 8) & 0xff,
> > + (y2 >> 0) & 0xff,
> > + };
> >
> > - r = src->ops->dsi.dcs_write_nosync(src, ddata->channel, buf, sizeof(buf));
>
> Also replacing a _nosync variant here.
>
> > + const struct mipi_dsi_msg msgY = {
> > + .channel = ddata->channel,
> > + .type = MIPI_DSI_GENERIC_LONG_WRITE,
> > + .tx_buf = paramY,
> > + .tx_len = 5,
> > + };
> > +
> > +
>
> A single blank line is enough.
>
> > + r = src->ops->dsi.transfer(src, &msgX);
> > if (r)
> > return r;
> >
> > - src->ops->dsi.bta_sync(src, ddata->channel);
> > + r = src->ops->dsi.transfer(src, &msgY);
>
> And here, you're replacing bta_sync. If I understand the code correctly,
> you're essentially removing an optimization, as each write will sync,
> right ? I'm fine with this change if we add the functionality back later
> in this series.
Yes, this is an optimization. X and Y will be sync'd together. This
is removed here, so that we can use the common helpers:
mipi_dsi_dcs_set_column_address() and mipi_dsi_dcs_set_page_address().
Actually those are also removed even further when the update
handling is moved to DSI encoder. It should be possible to
reintroduce it there without the need to expose the nosync
feature via DRM API.
> > + if (r)
> > + return r;
> >
> > return r;
> > }
> > @@ -991,6 +1023,27 @@ static int dsicm_get_te(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
> > return r;
> > }
> >
> > +static int dsicm_set_max_rx_packet_size(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev,
> > + u16 size)
>
> Please use tabs instead of spaces for indentation.
Ack.
> > +{
> > + struct panel_drv_data *ddata = to_panel_data(dssdev);
> > + struct omap_dss_device *src = ddata->src;
> > +
> > + const u8 buf[] = {
> > + size & 0xff,
> > + size >> 8 & 0xff,
> > + };
> > +
> > + const struct mipi_dsi_msg msg = {
> > + .channel = ddata->channel,
> > + .type = MIPI_DSI_SET_MAXIMUM_RETURN_PACKET_SIZE,
> > + .tx_buf = buf,
> > + .tx_len = 2,
> > + };
> > +
> > + return src->ops->dsi.transfer(src, &msg);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int dsicm_memory_read(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev,
> > void *buf, size_t size,
> > u16 x, u16 y, u16 w, u16 h)
> > @@ -1031,17 +1084,23 @@ static int dsicm_memory_read(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev,
> >
> > dsicm_set_update_window(ddata, x, y, w, h);
> >
> > - r = src->ops->dsi.set_max_rx_packet_size(src, ddata->channel, plen);
> > + r = dsicm_set_max_rx_packet_size(dssdev, plen);
> > if (r)
> > goto err2;
> >
> > while (buf_used < size) {
> > u8 dcs_cmd = first ? 0x2e : 0x3e;
> > + const struct mipi_dsi_msg msg = {
> > + .channel = ddata->channel,
> > + .type = MIPI_DSI_DCS_READ,
> > + .tx_buf = &dcs_cmd,
> > + .tx_len = 1,
> > + .rx_buf = buf + buf_used,
> > + .rx_len = size - buf_used,
> > + };
> > first = 0;
> >
> > - r = src->ops->dsi.dcs_read(src, ddata->channel, dcs_cmd,
> > - buf + buf_used, size - buf_used);
> > -
> > + r = src->ops->dsi.transfer(src, &msg);
> > if (r < 0) {
> > dev_err(dssdev->dev, "read error\n");
> > goto err3;
> > @@ -1065,7 +1124,7 @@ static int dsicm_memory_read(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev,
> > r = buf_used;
> >
> > err3:
> > - src->ops->dsi.set_max_rx_packet_size(src, ddata->channel, 1);
> > + dsicm_set_max_rx_packet_size(dssdev, 1);
> > err2:
> > src->ops->dsi.bus_unlock(src);
> > err1:
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20200226/5816396f/attachment.sig>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list