[Intel-gfx][PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: Add i915 device based MISSING_CASE macro

[Laxminarayan Bharadiya, Pankaj]

Hi Chris,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Sent: 25 February 2020 19:32
> To: David Airlie <airlied at linux.ie>; Joonas Lahtinen
> <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>; Laxminarayan Bharadiya, Pankaj
> <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya at intel.com>; Vivi, Rodrigo
> <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>; daniel at ffwll.ch; dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org;
> intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; jani.nikula at linux.intel.com
> Cc: Laxminarayan Bharadiya, Pankaj
> <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx][PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: Add i915 device based
> MISSING_CASE macro
> 
> Quoting Pankaj Bharadiya (2020-02-25 13:47:00)
> > Now that we have struct drm_device based drm_WARN, introduce struct
> > drm_i915_private based i915_MISSING_CASE macro which uses
> drm_WARN so
> > that device specific information will also get printed in backtrace.
> >
> > i915_MISSING_CASE macro should be preferred over MISSING_CASE,
> > wherever possible.
> 
> Whatever for? MISSING_CASE() itself should be a complete picture for the
> forgotten code.

Are you saying, no need to have a new device specific macro?

We want convert all the calls of WARN* with device specific drm_WARN* 
in i915, hence I introduced new i915_MISSING_CASE macro.

Jani, Will you please share your opinion on this?

Thanks,
Pankaj

> -Chris