Process identical patches in different tree
CK Hu
ck.hu at mediatek.com
Thu Jan 9 01:53:41 UTC 2020
Hi, Matthias:
On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 13:05 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> On 08/01/2020 12:14, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> > Hi CK,
> >
> > On 07/01/2020 03:56, CK Hu wrote:
> >> Hi, Dave, Daniel, Matthias:
> >>
> >> In mediatek-drm-next-5.6 [1], I've cherry-pick 3 patches from
> >> v5.5-next/soc [2] because some drm patches depend on these cmdq patches.
> >> So these cmdq patches exist in both tree now. I want to know how to
> >> process this case. I think we could choose one of below way:
> >>
> >> 1. Because these cmdq patches are identical in both tree, so each tree
> >> could do its own upstream and the there would be nothing happen when
> >> merge.
> >> 2. Let soc upstream first, and mediatek drm rebase on the latest
> >> mainline then upstream.
> >>
> >> Which one do you prefer?
> >>
> >
> > What we would need is a stable branch with this commits that get merged by both
> > trees. If I understand correctly that otherwise the SHA of the commits would be
> > different and that would provoke merge conflicts.
> >
> > We should not rely on one tree being merged before the other. AFAIK there is no
> > hard merge order between trees.
> >
>
> I prepared a branch with the patches I think are relevant for you. Please
> confirm that this is correct, merge the tree in yours and I'll do the same for
> v5.5-next/soc
>
> <paste>
>
> The following changes since commit e42617b825f8073569da76dc4510bfa019b1c35a:
>
> Linux 5.5-rc1 (2019-12-08 14:57:55 -0800)
>
> are available in the Git repository at:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/matthias.bgg/linux.git/
> tags/v5.5-next-cmdq-stable
>
> for you to fetch changes up to d412f18c9bc791d8951e903de9a68817e3098a6a:
>
> soc: mediatek: cmdq: add cmdq_dev_get_client_reg function (2020-01-08 12:59:57
> +0100)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> cmdq patches needed by drm driver to use cmdq interface
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Bibby Hsieh (4):
> soc: mediatek: cmdq: remove OR opertaion from err return
> soc: mediatek: cmdq: define the instruction struct
> soc: mediatek: cmdq: add polling function
> soc: mediatek: cmdq: add cmdq_dev_get_client_reg function
>
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq-helper.c | 147
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> include/linux/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.h | 11 ++++++
> include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq.h | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 185 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> </paste>
>
I've done in [1], is it what you expect?
[1]
https://github.com/ckhu-mediatek/linux.git-tags/commits/mediatek-drm-next-5.6
Regards,
CK
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list