[PATCH v2 0/7] Add dts for mt8183 GPU (and misc panfrost patches)
Steven Price
steven.price at arm.com
Thu Jan 9 13:29:35 UTC 2020
On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 01:10:33PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 09/01/2020 12:01 pm, Steven Price wrote:
> > On 08/01/2020 05:23, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> Sorry for the long delay since
> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11132381/,
> >> finally got around to give this a real try.
> >>
> >> The main purpose of this series is to upstream the dts change and the
> >> binding
> >> document, but I wanted to see how far I could probe the GPU, to check
> >> that the
> >> binding is indeed correct. The rest of the patches are
> >> RFC/work-in-progress, but
> >> I think some of them could already be picked up.
> >>
> >> So this is tested on MT8183 with a chromeos-4.19 kernel, and a ton of
> >> backports to get the latest panfrost driver (I should probably try on
> >> linux-next at some point but this was the path of least resistance).
> >>
> >> I tested it as a module as it's more challenging (originally probing
> >> would
> >> work built-in, on boot, but not as a module, as I didn't have the power
> >> domain changes, and all power domains are on by default during boot).
> >>
> >> Probing logs looks like this, currently:
> >> [ 221.867726] panfrost 13040000.gpu: clock rate = 511999970
> >> [ 221.867929] panfrost 13040000.gpu: Linked as a consumer to
> >> regulator.14
> >> [ 221.868600] panfrost 13040000.gpu: Linked as a consumer to
> >> regulator.31
> >> [ 221.870586] panfrost 13040000.gpu: Linked as a consumer to
> >> genpd:0:13040000.gpu
> >> [ 221.871492] panfrost 13040000.gpu: Linked as a consumer to
> >> genpd:1:13040000.gpu
> >> [ 221.871866] panfrost 13040000.gpu: Linked as a consumer to
> >> genpd:2:13040000.gpu
> >> [ 221.872427] panfrost 13040000.gpu: mali-g72 id 0x6221 major 0x0
> >> minor 0x3 status 0x0
> >> [ 221.872439] panfrost 13040000.gpu: features: 00000000,13de77ff,
> >> issues: 00000000,00000400
> >> [ 221.872445] panfrost 13040000.gpu: Features: L2:0x07120206
> >> Shader:0x00000000 Tiler:0x00000809 Mem:0x1 MMU:0x00002830 AS:0xff JS:0x7
> >> [ 221.872449] panfrost 13040000.gpu: shader_present=0x7 l2_present=0x1
> >> [ 221.873526] panfrost 13040000.gpu: error powering up gpu stack
> >> [ 221.878088] [drm] Initialized panfrost 1.1.0 20180908 for
> >> 13040000.gpu on minor 2
> >> [ 221.940817] panfrost 13040000.gpu: error powering up gpu stack
> >> [ 222.018233] panfrost 13040000.gpu: error powering up gpu stack
> >> (repeated)
> >
> > It's interesting that it's only the stack that is failing. In hardware
> > there's a dependency: L2->stack->shader - so in theory the shader cores
> > shouldn't be able to power up either. There are some known hardware bugs
> > here though[1]:
> >
> > MODULE_PARM_DESC(corestack_driver_control,
> > "Let the driver power on/off the GPU core stack
> > independently "
> > "without involving the Power Domain Controller. This should "
> > "only be enabled on platforms for which integration of the
> > PDC "
> > "to the Mali GPU is known to be problematic.");
> >
> > [1]
> > https://github.com/ianmacd/d2s/blob/master/drivers/gpu/arm/b_r16p0/backend/gpu/mali_kbase_pm_driver.c#L57
> >
> >
> > It might be worth just dropping the code for powering up/down stacks and
> > let the GPU's own dependency management handle it.
>
> FWIW I remember digging into that same message a while back (although
> I've forgotten which particular GPU I was playing with at the time), and
> concluded that the STACK_PWRON/STACK_READY registers might just not be
> implemented on some GPUs,
They are indeed not implemented on some GPUs. Specifically none of the
Midgard GPUs. I believe G71 also doesn't have it. However the register
addresses were picked so that on these older GPUs they should
read-as-zero and write-ignore so this shouldn't actually cause any
problems.
> and/or this easy-to-overlook register bit
> could be some kind of enable for the functionality:
>
> https://github.com/ianmacd/d2s/blob/master/drivers/gpu/arm/b_r16p0/backend/gpu/mali_kbase_pm_driver.c#L1631
>
> Since even in kbase this is all behind an 'expert' config option, I'm
> inclined to agree that just dropping it from panfrost unless and until
> it proves necessary is probably preferable to adding more logic and
> inscrutable register-magic.
Indeed - I'll post a patch removing it.
Thanks,
Steve
> Robin.
>
> >
> > Steve
> >
> >>
> >> So the GPU is probed, but there's an issue when powering up the STACK,
> >> not
> >> quite sure why, I'll try to have a deeper look, at some point.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> Nicolas
> >>
> >> v2:
> >> - Use sram instead of mali_sram as SRAM supply name.
> >> - Rename mali@ to gpu at .
> >> - Add dt-bindings changes
> >> - Stacking patches after the device tree change that allow basic
> >> probing (still incomplete and broken).
> >>
> >> Nicolas Boichat (7):
> >> dt-bindings: gpu: mali-bifrost: Add Mediatek MT8183
> >> arm64: dts: mt8183: Add node for the Mali GPU
> >> drm/panfrost: Improve error reporting in panfrost_gpu_power_on
> >> drm/panfrost: Add support for a second regulator for the GPU
> >> drm/panfrost: Add support for multiple power domain support
> >> RFC: drm/panfrost: Add bifrost compatible string
> >> RFC: drm/panfrost: devfreq: Add support for 2 regulators
> >>
> >> .../bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml | 20 ++++
> >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-evb.dts | 7 ++
> >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183.dtsi | 104 +++++++++++++++++
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c | 18 +++
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++--
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.h | 7 ++
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c | 1 +
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gpu.c | 15 ++-
> >> 8 files changed, 267 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dri-devel mailing list
> > dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list