TTM or vmwgfx tree? Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] mm, drm/ttm: Fix pte insertion with customized protection

[Thomas Hellström (VMware)]

Hi Christian,

On 1/15/20 1:41 PM, Thomas Hellström (VMware) wrote:
> From: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom at vmware.com>
>
> The drm/ttm module is using a modified on-stack copy of the
> struct vm_area_struct to be able to set a page protection with customized
> caching. Fix that by adding a vmf_insert_mixed_prot() function similar
> to the existing vmf_insert_pfn_prot() for use with drm/ttm.
>
> Patches are acked to be merged through a drm tree.

This small patchset should be ready to be merged now, with acks from Andrew.

Do you want to take it through the ttm tree, or should I ask Dave / 
Daniel to pull it separately?

Note that similar to the vmwgfx coherent patches, Linus has indicated 
that he wants separate pull requests for stuff like this that touches mm.

Thanks,

Thomas