[PATCH v3 4/7] drm/panfrost: Add support for multiple regulators

Steven Price steven.price at arm.com
Wed Jan 22 13:40:03 UTC 2020


On 21/01/2020 04:37, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 10:16 PM Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 03:15:59PM +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
>>
>>>   - I couldn't find a way to detect the number of regulators in the
>>>     device tree, if we wanted to refuse to probe the device if there
>>>     are too many regulators, which might be required for safety, see
>>>     the thread on v2 [1].
>>
>> You'd need to enumerate all the properties of the device and look
>> for things matching *-supply.
> 
> I see ,-) I was hoping for something slightly cleaner, or maybe an
> existing function in the core.
> 
> Steven: How strongly do you feel about this? If so I can add that
> check in the next revision.

I'm not that strongly bothered about it - my only worry is that there 
may be hardware out there that might be broken by not activating a 
regulator. But I don't know how common this multi-regulator design is in 
practise.

Thanks,

Steve

> Also, just a heads-up, I'm out for the next 2 weeks, I'll send v4 after that.
> 
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
> 



More information about the dri-devel mailing list