[PATCH -next] drm/komeda: Convert to DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE

[miaoqinglang]

在 2020/7/17 15:06, Daniel Vetter 写道:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 8:40 AM james qian wang (Arm Technology China)
> <james.qian.wang at arm.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 05:03:33PM +0800, Qinglang Miao wrote:
>>> From: Liu Shixin <liushixin2 at huawei.com>
>>>
>>> Use DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE macro to simplify the code.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2 at huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_dev.c | 13 +------------
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_dev.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_dev.c
>>> index 0246b2e94..4a10e6b9e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_dev.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_dev.c
>>> @@ -41,18 +41,7 @@ static int komeda_register_show(struct seq_file *sf, void *x)
>>>        return 0;
>>>   }
>>>
>>> -static int komeda_register_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>>> -{
>>> -     return single_open(filp, komeda_register_show, inode->i_private);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -static const struct file_operations komeda_register_fops = {
>>> -     .owner          = THIS_MODULE,
>>> -     .open           = komeda_register_open,
>>> -     .read_iter              = seq_read_iter,
>>> -     .llseek         = seq_lseek,
>>> -     .release        = single_release,
>>> -};
>>> +DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(komeda_register);
>>>
>>
>> Hi Shixin & Qinglang
>>
>> Thanks for your patch.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: James Qian Wang <james.qian.wang at arm.com>
>>
>> Since your patch is not for drm-misc-next, so seems better
>> to leave it to you to merge it. :)
> 
> I do think it's for drm-misc-next, what other tree would it be for?
> Some people put -next in their patch tag to differentiate from -fixes,
> so maintainers know what to do with the patch. It's also not part of a
> series, hence I think this is on you to apply it.
 >
Hi James & Daniel,

​Sorry I didn't make it clear in commit log, but it do based on linux-next.

​I think the reason why James think it's not for drm-misc-next
is conflicts exists when this patch being applied. There's conflicts 
because commit <4d4901c6d7> which switched over direct seq_read method 
calls to seq_read_iter should applied before this clean-up patch(linkage 
listed as below).

https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next/+/4d4901c6d748efab8aab6e7d2405dadaed0bea50

I can send a new patch based on mainline if needed.

​Thanks.

Qinglang

.
	
 >
> Cheers, Daniel
> 
>>
>> Thanks
>> James
>>
>>>   #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
>>>   static void komeda_debugfs_init(struct komeda_dev *mdev)
>>> --
>>> 2.17.1
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
> 
> 
>