[PATCH 4/5] drm/vblank: Use spin_(un)lock_irq() in drm_queue_vblank_event()

Lyude Paul lyude at redhat.com
Mon Jul 20 19:07:35 UTC 2020


This one's easy - we're already calling kzalloc() in this function, so
we must already be guaranteed to have IRQs enabled when calling this.
So, use the plain _irq() variants of spin_(un)lock() to make this more
obvious.

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
index 51f2e988205e7..64610070ba473 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
@@ -1611,7 +1611,6 @@ static int drm_queue_vblank_event(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe,
 	struct drm_vblank_crtc *vblank = &dev->vblank[pipe];
 	struct drm_pending_vblank_event *e;
 	ktime_t now;
-	unsigned long flags;
 	u64 seq;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -1633,7 +1632,7 @@ static int drm_queue_vblank_event(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe,
 			e->event.vbl.crtc_id = crtc->base.id;
 	}
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->event_lock, flags);
+	spin_lock_irq(&dev->event_lock);
 
 	/*
 	 * drm_crtc_vblank_off() might have been called after we called
@@ -1670,12 +1669,12 @@ static int drm_queue_vblank_event(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe,
 		vblwait->reply.sequence = req_seq;
 	}
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->event_lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&dev->event_lock);
 
 	return 0;
 
 err_unlock:
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->event_lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&dev->event_lock);
 	kfree(e);
 err_put:
 	drm_vblank_put(dev, pipe);
-- 
2.26.2



More information about the dri-devel mailing list