[PATCH 5/5] drm/vblank: Use spin_(un)lock_irq() in drm_crtc_queue_sequence_ioctl()
Lyude Paul
lyude at redhat.com
Mon Jul 20 19:07:36 UTC 2020
This is an ioctl callback, so we're guaranteed to have IRQs enabled when
calling this function. Use the plain _irq() variants of spin_(un)lock()
to make this more obvious.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
index 64610070ba473..b18e1efbbae1a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
@@ -2066,7 +2066,6 @@ int drm_crtc_queue_sequence_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
u64 seq;
u64 req_seq;
int ret;
- unsigned long spin_flags;
if (!drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -2114,7 +2113,7 @@ int drm_crtc_queue_sequence_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
e->event.base.length = sizeof(e->event.seq);
e->event.seq.user_data = queue_seq->user_data;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->event_lock, spin_flags);
+ spin_lock_irq(&dev->event_lock);
/*
* drm_crtc_vblank_off() might have been called after we called
@@ -2145,11 +2144,11 @@ int drm_crtc_queue_sequence_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
queue_seq->sequence = req_seq;
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->event_lock, spin_flags);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&dev->event_lock);
return 0;
err_unlock:
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->event_lock, spin_flags);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&dev->event_lock);
drm_crtc_vblank_put(crtc);
err_free:
kfree(e);
--
2.26.2
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list