[bug report] drm/ingenic: Add support for the IPU
Paul Cercueil
paul at crapouillou.net
Mon Jul 20 10:27:08 UTC 2020
Hi Dan,
Le lun. 20 juil. 2020 à 10:22, dan.carpenter at oracle.com a écrit :
> Hello Paul Cercueil,
>
> The patch fc1acf317b01: "drm/ingenic: Add support for the IPU" from
> Jul 16, 2020, leads to the following static checker warning:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c:232
> ingenic_drm_crtc_atomic_check()
> error: potentially dereferencing uninitialized 'ipu_state'.
I fixed it yesterday, commit 40a55dc13e9d in drm-misc-next.
> drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c
> 197 static int ingenic_drm_crtc_atomic_check(struct drm_crtc
> *crtc,
> 198 struct
> drm_crtc_state *state)
> 199 {
> 200 struct ingenic_drm *priv = drm_crtc_get_priv(crtc);
> 201 struct drm_plane_state *f1_state, *f0_state,
> *ipu_state;
> 202 long rate;
> 203
> 204 if (!drm_atomic_crtc_needs_modeset(state))
> 205 return 0;
> 206
> 207 if (state->mode.hdisplay > priv->soc_info->max_width
> ||
> 208 state->mode.vdisplay > priv->soc_info->max_height)
> 209 return -EINVAL;
> 210
> 211 rate = clk_round_rate(priv->pix_clk,
> 212 state->adjusted_mode.clock *
> 1000);
> 213 if (rate < 0)
> 214 return rate;
> 215
> 216 if (priv->soc_info->has_osd) {
> 217 f1_state =
> drm_atomic_get_plane_state(state->state, &priv->f1);
> 218 f0_state =
> drm_atomic_get_plane_state(state->state, &priv->f0);
> 219
> 220 if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_INGENIC_IPU) &&
> priv->ipu_plane) {
>
> Do we need to check both the CONFIG and the priv->ipu_plane or would
> it
> be sufficient to just check if (priv->ipu_plane) {?
It would be enough, yes.
Cheers,
-Paul
> 221 ipu_state =
> drm_atomic_get_plane_state(state->state, priv->ipu_plane);
> 222
> 223 /* IPU and F1 planes cannot be
> enabled at the same time. */
> 224 if (f1_state->fb && ipu_state->fb) {
> 225 dev_dbg(priv->dev, "Cannot
> enable both F1 and IPU\n");
> 226 return -EINVAL;
> 227 }
> 228 }
> 229
> 230 /* If all the planes are disabled, we won't
> get a VBLANK IRQ */
> 231 priv->no_vblank = !f1_state->fb &&
> !f0_state->fb &&
> 232 !(priv->ipu_plane &&
> ipu_state->fb);
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Because here we're only checking "priv->ipu_plane".
>
> 233 }
> 234
> 235 return 0;
> 236 }
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list