[PATCH 04/11] drm/ttm: cleanup coding style and implementation.

daniel at ffwll.ch daniel at ffwll.ch
Tue Jul 21 08:56:25 UTC 2020


On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 09:32:38AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Only functional change is to always keep io_reserved_count up to date
> for debugging even when it is not used otherwise.

Functional change in a cleanup patch. Tsk. It looks correct though ...

Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>

> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c | 97 +++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c
> index 6c05f4fd15ae..7fb3e0bcbab4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c
> @@ -115,39 +115,35 @@ static int ttm_mem_io_evict(struct ttm_mem_type_manager *man)
>  {
>  	struct ttm_buffer_object *bo;
>  
> -	if (!man->use_io_reserve_lru || list_empty(&man->io_reserve_lru))
> +	bo = list_first_entry_or_null(&man->io_reserve_lru,
> +				      struct ttm_buffer_object,
> +				      io_reserve_lru);
> +	if (!bo)
>  		return -ENOSPC;
>  
> -	bo = list_first_entry(&man->io_reserve_lru,
> -			      struct ttm_buffer_object,
> -			      io_reserve_lru);
>  	list_del_init(&bo->io_reserve_lru);
>  	ttm_bo_unmap_virtual_locked(bo);
> -
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -
>  int ttm_mem_io_reserve(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev,
>  		       struct ttm_mem_reg *mem)
>  {
>  	struct ttm_mem_type_manager *man = &bdev->man[mem->mem_type];
> -	int ret = 0;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (mem->bus.io_reserved_count++)
> +		return 0;
>  
>  	if (!bdev->driver->io_mem_reserve)
>  		return 0;
> -	if (likely(!man->use_io_reserve_lru))
> -		return bdev->driver->io_mem_reserve(bdev, mem);
>  
> -	if (bdev->driver->io_mem_reserve &&
> -	    mem->bus.io_reserved_count++ == 0) {
>  retry:
> -		ret = bdev->driver->io_mem_reserve(bdev, mem);
> -		if (ret == -ENOSPC) {
> -			ret = ttm_mem_io_evict(man);
> -			if (ret == 0)
> -				goto retry;
> -		}
> +	ret = bdev->driver->io_mem_reserve(bdev, mem);
> +	if (ret == -ENOSPC) {
> +		ret = ttm_mem_io_evict(man);
> +		if (ret == 0)
> +			goto retry;
>  	}
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -155,35 +151,31 @@ int ttm_mem_io_reserve(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev,
>  void ttm_mem_io_free(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev,
>  		     struct ttm_mem_reg *mem)
>  {
> -	struct ttm_mem_type_manager *man = &bdev->man[mem->mem_type];
> -
> -	if (likely(!man->use_io_reserve_lru))
> +	if (--mem->bus.io_reserved_count)
>  		return;
>  
> -	if (bdev->driver->io_mem_reserve &&
> -	    --mem->bus.io_reserved_count == 0 &&
> -	    bdev->driver->io_mem_free)
> -		bdev->driver->io_mem_free(bdev, mem);
> +	if (!bdev->driver->io_mem_free)
> +		return;
>  
> +	bdev->driver->io_mem_free(bdev, mem);
>  }
>  
>  int ttm_mem_io_reserve_vm(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
>  {
> +	struct ttm_mem_type_manager *man = &bo->bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type];
>  	struct ttm_mem_reg *mem = &bo->mem;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	if (!mem->bus.io_reserved_vm) {
> -		struct ttm_mem_type_manager *man =
> -			&bo->bdev->man[mem->mem_type];
> +	if (mem->bus.io_reserved_vm)
> +		return 0;
>  
> -		ret = ttm_mem_io_reserve(bo->bdev, mem);
> -		if (unlikely(ret != 0))
> -			return ret;
> -		mem->bus.io_reserved_vm = true;
> -		if (man->use_io_reserve_lru)
> -			list_add_tail(&bo->io_reserve_lru,
> -				      &man->io_reserve_lru);
> -	}
> +	ret = ttm_mem_io_reserve(bo->bdev, mem);
> +	if (unlikely(ret != 0))
> +		return ret;
> +	mem->bus.io_reserved_vm = true;
> +	if (man->use_io_reserve_lru)
> +		list_add_tail(&bo->io_reserve_lru,
> +			      &man->io_reserve_lru);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -191,15 +183,17 @@ void ttm_mem_io_free_vm(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
>  {
>  	struct ttm_mem_reg *mem = &bo->mem;
>  
> -	if (mem->bus.io_reserved_vm) {
> -		mem->bus.io_reserved_vm = false;
> -		list_del_init(&bo->io_reserve_lru);
> -		ttm_mem_io_free(bo->bdev, mem);
> -	}
> +	if (!mem->bus.io_reserved_vm)
> +		return;
> +
> +	mem->bus.io_reserved_vm = false;
> +	list_del_init(&bo->io_reserve_lru);
> +	ttm_mem_io_free(bo->bdev, mem);
>  }
>  
> -static int ttm_mem_reg_ioremap(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct ttm_mem_reg *mem,
> -			void **virtual)
> +static int ttm_mem_reg_ioremap(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev,
> +			       struct ttm_mem_reg *mem,
> +			       void **virtual)
>  {
>  	struct ttm_mem_type_manager *man = &bdev->man[mem->mem_type];
>  	int ret;
> @@ -216,9 +210,11 @@ static int ttm_mem_reg_ioremap(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct ttm_mem_reg *m
>  		addr = mem->bus.addr;
>  	} else {
>  		if (mem->placement & TTM_PL_FLAG_WC)
> -			addr = ioremap_wc(mem->bus.base + mem->bus.offset, mem->bus.size);
> +			addr = ioremap_wc(mem->bus.base + mem->bus.offset,
> +					  mem->bus.size);
>  		else
> -			addr = ioremap(mem->bus.base + mem->bus.offset, mem->bus.size);
> +			addr = ioremap(mem->bus.base + mem->bus.offset,
> +				       mem->bus.size);
>  		if (!addr) {
>  			(void) ttm_mem_io_lock(man, false);
>  			ttm_mem_io_free(bdev, mem);
> @@ -230,8 +226,9 @@ static int ttm_mem_reg_ioremap(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct ttm_mem_reg *m
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static void ttm_mem_reg_iounmap(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct ttm_mem_reg *mem,
> -			 void *virtual)
> +static void ttm_mem_reg_iounmap(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev,
> +				struct ttm_mem_reg *mem,
> +				void *virtual)
>  {
>  	struct ttm_mem_type_manager *man;
>  
> @@ -513,11 +510,13 @@ static int ttm_bo_ioremap(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>  	} else {
>  		map->bo_kmap_type = ttm_bo_map_iomap;
>  		if (mem->placement & TTM_PL_FLAG_WC)
> -			map->virtual = ioremap_wc(bo->mem.bus.base + bo->mem.bus.offset + offset,
> +			map->virtual = ioremap_wc(bo->mem.bus.base +
> +						  bo->mem.bus.offset + offset,
>  						  size);
>  		else
> -			map->virtual = ioremap(bo->mem.bus.base + bo->mem.bus.offset + offset,
> -						       size);
> +			map->virtual = ioremap(bo->mem.bus.base +
> +					       bo->mem.bus.offset + offset,
> +					       size);
>  	}
>  	return (!map->virtual) ? -ENOMEM : 0;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch


More information about the dri-devel mailing list