[PATCH 1/2] video: fbdev: amifb: remove dead APUS support
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
glaubitz at physik.fu-berlin.de
Tue Jun 2 11:07:33 UTC 2020
Hi!
On 6/2/20 1:04 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> What do you mean with the sentence "when arch/ppc/ was still king"?
>
> Ah, Bartl copied that from my email ;-)
>
> There used to be APUS support under arch/ppc/.
> Later, 32-bit arch/ppc/ and 64-bit arch/ppc64/ were merged in a new\
> architecture port under arch/powerpc/, and the old ones were dropped.
> APUS was never converted, and thus dropped.
Ah, yes. Similar to the merge with x86.
>> Does that mean - in the case we would re-add APUS support in the future, that
>> these particular changes would not be necessary?
>
> They would still be necessary, as PowerPC doesn't grok m68k instructions.
> Alternatively, we could just drop the m68k inline asm, and retain the C
> version instead? I have no idea how big of a difference that would make
> on m68k, using a more modern compiler than when the code was written
> originally.
Hmm, no idea. I would keep the assembly for the time being. This was just
a question out of curiosity. We could still consider such a change if
someone should consider working on APUS support again.
> Note that all of this is used only for cursor handling, which I doubt is
> actually used by any user space application. The only exception is the
> DIVUL() macro, which is used once during initialization, thus also not
> performance critical.
I see, thanks.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz at debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz at physik.fu-berlin.de
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list