[PATCH 53/59] drm/arc: Move to drm/tiny

[Eugeniy Paltsev]

Hi Daniel,

I've already tested it (and found several issues), so please check my reply here:
https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org/msg07403.html

Not sure why you didn't receive my reply (probably the reason is because it was sent to your @ffwll.ch mail instead of @intel.com one).

________________________________________
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch>
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 11:05
To: Alexey Brodkin
Cc: Intel Graphics Development; DRI Development; Daniel Vetter; Eugeniy Paltsev; Sam Ravnborg
Subject: Re: [PATCH 53/59] drm/arc: Move to drm/tiny

On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 08:07:41PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 3:56 PM Alexey Brodkin
> <Alexey.Brodkin at synopsys.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > > > Looking at this patch series, feels a bit like hand-rolling of bridge
> > > > code, badly. We should get away from that.
> > > >
> > > > Once you have that I think the end result is tiny enough that it can
> > > > stay, bridges intergrate quite well into simple display pipe drivers.
> > > >
> > > > > BTW should I pull that series in my tree and send you a pull-request
> > > > > or that kind of change needs to go through another tree?
> > > > >
> > > > > Also I'd like to test the change we discuss here to make sure stuff
> > > > > still works. Once we do that I'll send an update. Any hint on
> > > > > when that change needs to be acked/nacked?
> > > >
> > > > Simplest is if this can all land through drm-misc, is arc not
> > > > maintained in there? And there's plenty of time for testing, I'm just
> > > > slowly crawling through the tree to get everything polished and
> > > > cleaned up in this area.
> > >
> > > Any updates on testing this pile here? First patch landed now, and I've
> > > started to push driver patches. So would be good to get this sorted out
> > > too.
> >
> > Sorry we're in the middle of 2 long weekends so missed this one.
> > I guess we'll be able to test it in a week or two from now.
> >
> > Is that OK?
>
> This aren't high-priority, so totally ok. As long as you don't land a
> driver rewrite and I have to rebase everything :-)

Ping for a bit of testing on this stuff ...
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://blog.ffwll.ch__;!!A4F2R9G_pg!Ncpf9M5g5wUEicELHfzz8syA0c0KogYc2E0tdnXGHGmUwGbROv-vwMDISCh7u6w58Dgs-ws$