[drm/mgag200] e44e907dd8: phoronix-test-suite.glmark2.800x600.score -64.9% regression
Rong Chen
rong.a.chen at intel.com
Wed Jun 17 01:42:53 UTC 2020
On 6/16/20 9:49 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 16.06.20 um 05:10 schrieb Rong Chen:
>>
>> On 6/16/20 4:58 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 at 08:11, kernel test robot <rong.a.chen at intel.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Greeting,
>>>>
>>>> FYI, we noticed a -64.9% regression of
>>>> phoronix-test-suite.glmark2.800x600.score due to commit:
>>>>
>>> On one hand, I'm really happy to see performance testing happening
>>> although this report is missing various crucial pieces of information.
>>>
>>>> commit: e44e907dd8f937313d35615d799d54162c56d173 ("[PATCH v3 05/15]
>>>> drm/mgag200: Split MISC register update into PLL selection, SYNC and
>>>> I/O")
>>>> url:
>>>> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Thomas-Zimmermann/drm-mgag200-Convert-to-atomic-modesetting/20200515-163744
>>>>
>>>> base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-tip drm-tip
>>>>
>>>> in testcase: phoronix-test-suite
>>>> on test machine: 16 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5570 @ 2.93GHz with
>>>> 48G memory
>>>> with following parameters:
>>>>
>>>> need_x: true
>>> Replace "need_x" with the Xorg version as seen in `Xorg -version'.
>> # Xorg -version
>> /bin/sh: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8)
>>
>> X.Org X Server 1.20.4
>> X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
>> Build Operating System: Linux 4.9.0-8-amd64 x86_64 Debian
>> Current Operating System: Linux lkp-nhm-2ep1
>> 5.7.0-rc5-01428-ge44e907dd8f937 #1 SMP Tue Jun 2 19:51:38 CST 2020 x86_64
>> Kernel command line: ip=::::lkp-nhm-2ep1::dhcp
>> root=/dev/disk/by-id/wwn-0x55cd2e4123123127-part2
>> rootflags=subvol=debian-x86_64-phoronix
>> remote_rootfs=internal-lkp-server:/osimage/debian/debian-x86_64-phoronix
>> user=lkp
>> job=/lkp/jobs/scheduled/lkp-nhm-2ep1/phoronix-test-suite-performance-true-glmark2-1.1.0-ucode=0x1d-debian-x86_64-phoronix-e44e907dd8f937313d35615d799d54162c56d173-20200616-56456-1kgmjzm-0.yaml
>> ARCH=x86_64 kconfig=x86_64-rhel-7.6
>> branch=linux-devel/devel-hourly-2020051600
>> commit=e44e907dd8f937313d35615d799d54162c56d173
>> BOOT_IMAGE=/pkg/linux/x86_64-rhel-7.6/gcc-7/e44e907dd8f937313d35615d799d54162c56d173/vmlinuz-5.7.0-rc5-01428-ge44e907dd8f937
>> console=ttyS1,115200 console=tty0 max_uptime=3600
>> RESULT_ROOT=/result/phoronix-test-suite/performance-true-glmark2-1.1.0-ucode=0x1d/lkp-nhm-2ep1/debian-x86_64-phoronix/x86_64-rhel-7.6/gcc-7/e44e907dd8f937313d35615d799d54162c56d173/4
>> LKP_SERVER=inn nokaslr selinux=0 debug apic=debug sysrq_always_enabled
>> rcupdate.rcu_cpu_stall_timeout=100 net.ifnames=0 printk.devkmsg=on
>> panic=-1 softlockup_panic=1 nmi_watchdog=panic oops=panic load_ramdisk=2
>> prompt_ramdisk=0 drbd.minor_count=8 systemd.log_level=err
>> ignore_loglevel console=tty0 earlyprintk=ttyS0,115200
>> console=ttyS0,115200 vga=normal rw
>> Build Date: 05 March 2019 08:11:12PM
>> xorg-server 2:1.20.4-1 (https://www.debian.org/support)
>> Current version of pixman: 0.36.0
>> Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
>> to make sure that you have the latest version.
>>
>>>> test: glmark2-1.1.0
>>>> cpufreq_governor: performance
>>>> ucode: 0x1d
>>>>
>>>> test-description: The Phoronix Test Suite is the most comprehensive
>>>> testing and benchmarking platform available that provides an
>>>> extensible framework for which new tests can be easily added.
>>>> test-url: http://www.phoronix-test-suite.com/
>>>>
>>> Please remove the test description and url. They don't add any value.
>>>
>>> Mention which Mesa version is used as well as on what GPU. The output
>>> of lspci and glxinfo will help here.
>> Attached please find the outputs of lspci and glxinfo
>>
>>> For this particular test - there is no Mesa/upstream driver for this
>>> GPU, so I imagine one of the swrast drivers was used. Which one -
>>> swrast (classic, softpipe, llvmpipe, swr) or kms_swrast.
>>> The output of `LD_DEBUG=libs glxinfo |& grep _dri.so` will help here.
>> # LD_DEBUG=libs glxinfo |& grep _dri.so
>> 2132: calling init: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/dri/swrast_dri.so
>> 2132: calling fini: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/dri/swrast_dri.so [0]
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Rong Chen
> Thanks for testing. If I send out a patch, could you try it?
Yes, we can test the new patch if still needed.
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
>>>> commit:
>>>> bef2303526 ("drm/mgag200: Move mode-setting code into separate
>>>> helper function")
>>>> e44e907dd8 ("drm/mgag200: Split MISC register update into PLL
>>>> selection, SYNC and I/O")
>>>>
>>> Actually the offending commit has a subtle change of behaviour - it
>>> adds an extra MGAREG_MISC_RAMMAPEN.
>>> That is not documented and I've failed to spot it during review.
>>>
>>> Thomas - shall we revert that line in itself or at least add an inline
>>> comment why it is needed?
>>>
>>>> 100
>>>> +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>> 90 |-+ + + +.+ + + + + +
>>>> : |
>>>> | : : : : : : : : : :
>>>> : |
>>>> 80 |-: : : : : : : : : :
>>>> : |
>>>> 70 |-:: : :: : : : :: :: : ::
>>>> : |
>>>> |: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
>>>> : |
>>>> 60 |:+: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
>>>> : |
>>>> 50 |:+: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
>>>> : |
>>>> 40 |:+ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
>>>> : |
>>>> |: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :O O
>>>> O O O |
>>>> 30 |:+ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
>>>> : |
>>>> 20 |-+ :: : : : : : :: : : :: : : O
>>>> : |
>>>> | : : : : : : : : : : : :
>>>> : |
>>>> 10 |-+ : : : : : : : : : : : :
>>>> : |
>>>> 0
>>>> +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> phoronix-test-suite.glmark2.1024x768.score
>>>>
>>>> 70
>>>> +----------------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>> | + + + +..+ + + + + +
>>>> +.+ |
>>>> 60 |-: : : : : : : : : :
>>>> : |
>>>> | : : : : : : : : : :
>>>> : |
>>>> 50 |-:: : :: : : :: : : :: ::
>>>> : |
>>>> |: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
>>>> : |
>>>> 40 |:+: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
>>>> : |
>>>> |: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
>>>> O |
>>>> 30 |:+ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :O
>>>> O O O |
>>>> |: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
>>>> : |
>>>> 20 |:+ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
>>>> : |
>>>> | :: : : : : : :: : : :: : : O
>>>> :: |
>>>> 10 |-+ : : : : : : : : : : : :
>>>> : |
>>>> | : : : O : O : : O : : : O : : :
>>>> : |
>>>> 0
>>>> +----------------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [*] bisect-good sample
>>>> [O] bisect-bad sample
>>>>
>>> Hmm I must be going blind - there isn't even a single * in either of
>>> the graphs.
>>> Or perhaps my eyesight is fine and the legend or the graphs need fixing.
>>>
>>> HTH
>>> -Emil
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list