[PATCH v3] drm/panfrost: Reduce the amount of logs on deferred probe

[Steven Price]

On 17/06/2020 20:57, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 8:36 AM Steven Price <steven.price at arm.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 17/06/2020 15:15, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 04:43:34PM -0400, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote:
>>>> Reviewed-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig at collabora.com>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:05:44PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> There is no point to print deferred probe (and its failures to get
>>>>> resources) as an error.  Also there is no need to print regulator errors
>>>>> twice.
>>>>>
>>>>> In case of multiple probe tries this would pollute the dmesg.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price at arm.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes since v2:
>>>>> 1. Rebase
>>>>> 2. Add Steven's review
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes since v1:
>>>>> 1. Remove second error message from calling panfrost_regulator_init()
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.c | 8 ++++----
>>>>>    1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Rob, Tomeu and Steven,
>>>
>>> You're listed as maintainers for panfrost. Is anyone going to pick this
>>> up?
>>
>> I'm only a reviewer so I've been leaving it for Rob or Tomeu, but I can
>> pick it up if Rob/Tomeu are happy for me to do that.
>>
>>> Maybe I sent it to wrong mailing list or forgot about anything?
>>
>> No, there's actually a few Panfrost commits waiting, it was on my todo
>> list to ask if Rob/Tomeu needed some help with merging patches.
> 
> Please do, I haven't had the cycles for panfrost lately.
> 
> Rob
> 

Ok, this patch is pushed to drm-misc-next. I'll dig through my emails 
for the other patches which are pending and take a look at them too.

Steve