[PATCH][next] drm/drm_displayid.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

[Gustavo A. R. Silva]

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo at embeddedor.com>
---
 include/drm/drm_displayid.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/drm/drm_displayid.h b/include/drm/drm_displayid.h
index 9d3b745c3107..94b4390bf990 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_displayid.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_displayid.h
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ struct displayid_detailed_timings_1 {
 
 struct displayid_detailed_timing_block {
 	struct displayid_block base;
-	struct displayid_detailed_timings_1 timings[0];
+	struct displayid_detailed_timings_1 timings[];
 };
 
 #define for_each_displayid_db(displayid, block, idx, length) \
-- 
2.25.0