[v1] dt-bindings: msm: disp: add yaml schemas for DPU and DSI bindings
Sam Ravnborg
sam at ravnborg.org
Sat Mar 7 11:40:54 UTC 2020
Hi Krishna.
Thanks for these bindings files.
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 05:06:00PM +0530, Krishna Manikandan wrote:
> MSM Mobile Display Subsytem(MDSS) encapsulates sub-blocks
> like DPU display controller, DSI etc. Add YAML schema
> for the device tree bindings for the same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krishna Manikandan <mkrishn at codeaurora.org>
> ---
> .../bindings/display/msm/dpu-sc7180.yaml | 269 +++++++++++++++
> .../bindings/display/msm/dpu-sdm845.yaml | 265 +++++++++++++++
> .../bindings/display/msm/dsi-sc7180.yaml | 369 +++++++++++++++++++++
> .../bindings/display/msm/dsi-sdm845.yaml | 369 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 1272 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dpu-sc7180.yaml
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dpu-sdm845.yaml
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-sc7180.yaml
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-sdm845.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dpu-sc7180.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dpu-sc7180.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..3d1d9b8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dpu-sc7180.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,269 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/msm/dpu-sc7180.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Description of Qualcomm Display Dpu dt properties.
Try to be cossistent in capitilization of Dpu versus DPU
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Krishna Manikandan <mkrishn at codeaurora.org>
> +
> +description: |
> + Device tree bindings for MSM Mobile Display Subsytem(MDSS) that encapsulates
> + sub-blocks like DPU display controller, DSI and DP interfaces etc. Device tree
> + bindings of MDSS and DPU are mentioned for SC7180 target.
Bindings should use an indent of two spaces.
This is what is used in the example schema and the de-facto standard.
One space indent makes it very hard to follow the indent.
For examples the indent varies. From 2 spaces to 8 spaces.
I often use 4 spaces as 2 spaces is not enough when it spans several
lines. But there is nothing fixed there.
> +
> +properties:
> + "mdss":
> + type: object
> + description: |
> + Node containing MDSS that encapsulated sub-blocks like DPU, DSI and DP
> + interfaces.
> +
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + items:
> + - const: qcom,sc7180-mdss
> + reg:
> + description: |
> + Physical base address and length of controller's registers.
Add empty line between properties (empty line before reg:).
> +
> + reg-names:
> + description: |
> + Names for different register regions defined above. The required region
> + is mentioned below.
> + items:
> + - const: mdss
> +
> + power-domains:
> + description: |
> + A power domain consumer specifier according to
> + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt.
Should this be power-domain.yaml?
> +
> + clocks:
> + description: |
> + List of clock specifiers for clocks needed by the device.
Do not use "|" unless required. Fine to have text on same line as
description: .
Sam
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list