[PATCH] drm/amd/display: Fix pageflip event race condition for DCN. (v2)
Kazlauskas, Nicholas
nicholas.kazlauskas at amd.com
Fri Mar 13 12:35:30 UTC 2020
On 2020-03-12 10:32 a.m., Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 4:21 PM Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Commit '16f17eda8bad ("drm/amd/display: Send vblank and user
>> events at vsartup for DCN")' introduces a new way of pageflip
>> completion handling for DCN, and some trouble.
>>
>> The current implementation introduces a race condition, which
>> can cause pageflip completion events to be sent out one vblank
>> too early, thereby confusing userspace and causing flicker:
>>
>> prepare_flip_isr():
>>
>> 1. Pageflip programming takes the ddev->event_lock.
>> 2. Sets acrtc->pflip_status == AMDGPU_FLIP_SUBMITTED
>> 3. Releases ddev->event_lock.
>>
>> --> Deadline for surface address regs double-buffering passes on
>> target pipe.
>>
>> 4. dc_commit_updates_for_stream() MMIO programs the new pageflip
>> into hw, but too late for current vblank.
>>
>> => pflip_status == AMDGPU_FLIP_SUBMITTED, but flip won't complete
>> in current vblank due to missing the double-buffering deadline
>> by a tiny bit.
>>
>> 5. VSTARTUP trigger point in vblank is reached, VSTARTUP irq fires,
>> dm_dcn_crtc_high_irq() gets called.
>>
>> 6. Detects pflip_status == AMDGPU_FLIP_SUBMITTED and assumes the
>> pageflip has been completed/will complete in this vblank and
>> sends out pageflip completion event to userspace and resets
>> pflip_status = AMDGPU_FLIP_NONE.
>>
>> => Flip completion event sent out one vblank too early.
>>
>> This behaviour has been observed during my testing with measurement
>> hardware a couple of time.
>>
>> The commit message says that the extra flip event code was added to
>> dm_dcn_crtc_high_irq() to prevent missing to send out pageflip events
>> in case the pflip irq doesn't fire, because the "DCH HUBP" component
>> is clock gated and doesn't fire pflip irqs in that state. Also that
>> this clock gating may happen if no planes are active. According to
>> Nicholas, the clock gating can also happen if psr is active, and the
>> gating is controlled independently by the hardware, so difficult to
>> detect if and when the completion code in above commit is needed.
>>
>> This patch tries the following solution: It only executes the extra pflip
>> completion code in dm_dcn_crtc_high_irq() iff the hardware reports
>> that there aren't any surface updated pending in the double-buffered
>> surface scanout address registers. Otherwise it leaves pflip completion
>> to the pflip irq handler, for a more race-free experience.
>>
>> This would only guard against the order of events mentioned above.
>> If Step 5 (VSTARTUP trigger) happens before step 4 then this won't help
>> at all, because 1-3 + 5 might happen even without the hw being programmed
>> at all, ie. no surface update pending because none yet programmed into hw.
>>
>> Therefore this patch also changes locking in amdgpu_dm_commit_planes(),
>> so that prepare_flip_isr() and dc_commit_updates_for_stream() are done
>> under event_lock protection within the same critical section.
>>
>> v2: Take Nicholas comments into account, try a different solution.
>>
>> Lightly tested on Polaris (locking) and Raven (the whole DCN stuff).
>> Seems to work without causing obvious new trouble.
>
> Nick, any comments on this? Can we get this committed or do you think
> it needs additional rework?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alex
Hi Alex, Mario,
This might be a little strange, but if we want to get this in as a fix
for regressions caused by the original vblank and user events at
vstartup patch then I'm actually going to give my reviewed by on the
*v1* of this patch (but not this v2):
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas at amd.com>
You can feel free to apply that one.
Reason 1: After having thought about it some more I don't think we
enable anything today that has hubp powered down at the same time we
expect to be waiting for a flip - eg. DMCU powering down HUBP during PSR
entry. Static screen interrupt should happen after that flip finishes I
think.
The CRTC can still be powered on with zero planes, and I don't think any
userspace explicitly asks for vblank events in this case but it doesn't
hurt to have the check.
Reason 2: This new patch will need much more thorough testing from side
to fully understand the consequences of locking the entire DC commit
sequence. For just a page flip that sounds fine, but for anything more
than (eg. full updates, modesets, etc) I don't think we want to be
disabling interrupts for potentially many milliseconds.
Maybe we could just use a lock-free queue here for the events. It's
single producer/single consumer per CRTC.
Regards,
Nicholas Kazlauskas
>
>>
>> Fixes: 16f17eda8bad ("drm/amd/display: Send vblank and user events at vsartup for DCN")
>> Signed-off-by: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com>
>> ---
>> .../gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
>> index d7df1a85e72f..aa4e941b276f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
>> @@ -287,6 +287,28 @@ static inline bool amdgpu_dm_vrr_active(struct dm_crtc_state *dm_state)
>> dm_state->freesync_config.state == VRR_STATE_ACTIVE_FIXED;
>> }
>>
>> +/**
>> + * dm_crtc_is_flip_pending() - Is a pageflip pending on this crtc?
>> + *
>> + * Returns true if any plane on the crtc has a flip pending, false otherwise.
>> + */
>> +static bool dm_crtc_is_flip_pending(struct dm_crtc_state *acrtc_state)
>> +{
>> + struct dc_stream_status *status = dc_stream_get_status(acrtc_state->stream);
>> + const struct dc_plane_status *plane_status;
>> + int i;
>> + bool pending = false;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < status->plane_count; i++) {
>> + plane_status = dc_plane_get_status(status->plane_states[i]);
>> + pending |= plane_status->is_flip_pending;
>> + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("plane:%d, flip_pending=%d\n",
>> + i, plane_status->is_flip_pending);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return pending;
>> +}
>> +
>> /**
>> * dm_pflip_high_irq() - Handle pageflip interrupt
>> * @interrupt_params: ignored
>> @@ -435,6 +457,11 @@ static void dm_vupdate_high_irq(void *interrupt_params)
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adev->ddev->event_lock, flags);
>> }
>> }
>> +
>> + if (acrtc->pflip_status == AMDGPU_FLIP_SUBMITTED) {
>> + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("%s:crtc:%d, flip_pending=%d\n", __func__,
>> + acrtc->crtc_id, dm_crtc_is_flip_pending(acrtc_state));
>> + }
>> }
>> }
>>
>> @@ -489,6 +516,11 @@ static void dm_crtc_high_irq(void *interrupt_params)
>> &acrtc_state->vrr_params.adjust);
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adev->ddev->event_lock, flags);
>> }
>> +
>> + if (acrtc->pflip_status == AMDGPU_FLIP_SUBMITTED) {
>> + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("%s:crtc:%d, flip_pending=%d\n", __func__,
>> + acrtc->crtc_id, dm_crtc_is_flip_pending(acrtc_state));
>> + }
>> }
>> }
>>
>> @@ -543,13 +575,29 @@ static void dm_dcn_crtc_high_irq(void *interrupt_params)
>> &acrtc_state->vrr_params.adjust);
>> }
>>
>> - if (acrtc->pflip_status == AMDGPU_FLIP_SUBMITTED) {
>> + /*
>> + * If there aren't any active_planes, or PSR is active, then DCH HUBP
>> + * may be clock-gated. In that state, pageflip completion interrupts
>> + * won't fire and pageflip completion events won't get delivered.
>> + *
>> + * Prevent this by sending pending pageflip events from here if a flip
>> + * has been submitted, but is no longer pending in hw, ie. has already
>> + * completed.
>> + *
>> + * If the flip is still pending in hw, then use dm_pflip_high_irq()
>> + * instead, handling completion as usual by pflip irq.
>> + */
>> + if (acrtc->pflip_status == AMDGPU_FLIP_SUBMITTED &&
>> + !dm_crtc_is_flip_pending(acrtc_state)) {
>> if (acrtc->event) {
>> drm_crtc_send_vblank_event(&acrtc->base, acrtc->event);
>> acrtc->event = NULL;
>> drm_crtc_vblank_put(&acrtc->base);
>> }
>> acrtc->pflip_status = AMDGPU_FLIP_NONE;
>> +
>> + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("crtc:%d, pflip_stat:AMDGPU_FLIP_NONE\n",
>> + acrtc->crtc_id);
>> }
>>
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adev->ddev->event_lock, flags);
>> @@ -6325,7 +6373,7 @@ static void amdgpu_dm_commit_planes(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
>> to_dm_crtc_state(drm_atomic_get_old_crtc_state(state, pcrtc));
>> int planes_count = 0, vpos, hpos;
>> long r;
>> - unsigned long flags;
>> + unsigned long flags = 0;
>> struct amdgpu_bo *abo;
>> uint64_t tiling_flags;
>> uint32_t target_vblank, last_flip_vblank;
>> @@ -6513,17 +6561,6 @@ static void amdgpu_dm_commit_planes(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
>> usleep_range(1000, 1100);
>> }
>>
>> - if (acrtc_attach->base.state->event) {
>> - drm_crtc_vblank_get(pcrtc);
>> -
>> - spin_lock_irqsave(&pcrtc->dev->event_lock, flags);
>> -
>> - WARN_ON(acrtc_attach->pflip_status != AMDGPU_FLIP_NONE);
>> - prepare_flip_isr(acrtc_attach);
>> -
>> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pcrtc->dev->event_lock, flags);
>> - }
>> -
>> if (acrtc_state->stream) {
>> if (acrtc_state->freesync_vrr_info_changed)
>> bundle->stream_update.vrr_infopacket =
>> @@ -6575,6 +6612,15 @@ static void amdgpu_dm_commit_planes(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
>> acrtc_state->stream->link->psr_allow_active)
>> amdgpu_dm_psr_disable(acrtc_state->stream);
>>
>> + if (pflip_present && acrtc_attach->base.state->event) {
>> + drm_crtc_vblank_get(pcrtc);
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&pcrtc->dev->event_lock, flags);
>> +
>> + WARN_ON(acrtc_attach->pflip_status != AMDGPU_FLIP_NONE);
>> + prepare_flip_isr(acrtc_attach);
>> + }
>> +
>> dc_commit_updates_for_stream(dm->dc,
>> bundle->surface_updates,
>> planes_count,
>> @@ -6582,6 +6628,14 @@ static void amdgpu_dm_commit_planes(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
>> &bundle->stream_update,
>> dc_state);
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Must event_lock protect prepare_flip_isr() above and
>> + * dc_commit_updates_for_stream within same critical section,
>> + * or pageflip completion will suffer bad races on DCN.
>> + */
>> + if (pflip_present && acrtc_attach->pflip_status == AMDGPU_FLIP_SUBMITTED)
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pcrtc->dev->event_lock, flags);
>> +
>> if ((acrtc_state->update_type > UPDATE_TYPE_FAST) &&
>> acrtc_state->stream->psr_version &&
>> !acrtc_state->stream->link->psr_feature_enabled)
>> --
>> 2.20.1
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> amd-gfx mailing list
>> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list