[PATCH] backlight: lp855x: Ensure regulators are disabled on probe failure

Jon Hunter jonathanh at nvidia.com
Fri Mar 13 14:16:16 UTC 2020


Hi Lee, Daniel,

On 24/02/2020 14:37, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 02:07:48PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> If probing the LP885x backlight fails after the regulators have been
>> enabled, then the following warning is seen when releasing the
>> regulators ...
>>
>>  WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 289 at drivers/regulator/core.c:2051 _regulator_put.part.28+0x158/0x160
>>  Modules linked in: tegra_xudc lp855x_bl(+) host1x pwm_tegra ip_tables x_tables ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6
>>  CPU: 1 PID: 289 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 5.6.0-rc2-next-20200224 #1
>>  Hardware name: NVIDIA Jetson TX1 Developer Kit (DT)
>>
>>  ...
>>
>>  Call trace:
>>   _regulator_put.part.28+0x158/0x160
>>   regulator_put+0x34/0x50
>>   devm_regulator_release+0x10/0x18
>>   release_nodes+0x12c/0x230
>>   devres_release_all+0x34/0x50
>>   really_probe+0x1c0/0x370
>>   driver_probe_device+0x58/0x100
>>   device_driver_attach+0x6c/0x78
>>   __driver_attach+0xb0/0xf0
>>   bus_for_each_dev+0x68/0xc8
>>   driver_attach+0x20/0x28
>>   bus_add_driver+0x160/0x1f0
>>   driver_register+0x60/0x110
>>   i2c_register_driver+0x40/0x80
>>   lp855x_driver_init+0x20/0x1000 [lp855x_bl]
>>   do_one_initcall+0x58/0x1a0
>>   do_init_module+0x54/0x1d0
>>   load_module+0x1d80/0x21c8
>>   __do_sys_finit_module+0xe8/0x100
>>   __arm64_sys_finit_module+0x18/0x20
>>   el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0xb0/0x168
>>   do_el0_svc+0x20/0x98
>>   el0_sync_handler+0xf4/0x1b0
>>   el0_sync+0x140/0x180
>>
>> Fix this by ensuring that the regulators are disabled, if enabled, on
>> probe failure.
>>
>> Finally, ensure that the vddio regulator is disabled in the driver
>> remove handler.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh at nvidia.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson at linaro.org>
I received a bounce from Milo's email and so I am not sure that his
email address is still valid.

Can either of you pick this up?

Not sure if we should update the MAINTAINERS as well?

Jon

-- 
nvpublic


More information about the dri-devel mailing list