[PATCH RESEND] drm/lease: fix potential race in fill_object_idr
Qiujun Huang
hqjagain at gmail.com
Tue Mar 17 22:33:34 UTC 2020
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 1:02 AM Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 03:18:23PM +0800, Qiujun Huang wrote:
> > We should hold idr_mutex for idr_alloc.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Qiujun Huang <hqjagain at gmail.com>
>
> I've not seen the first version of this anywhere in my inbox, not sure
> where that got lost.
>
> Anyway, this seems like a false positive - I'm assuming this was caught
> with KCSAN. The commit message really should mention that.
>
> fill_object_idr creates the idr, which yes is only access later on under
> the idr_mutex. But here it's not yet visible to any other thread, and
> hence lockless access is safe and correct.
Agree that.
Thanks.
>
> No idea what the KCSAN complains about safe access like this best practice
> is.
> -Daniel
>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list