[PATCH v1 17/30] mmc: sdhci-tegra: Support OPP and core voltage scaling

[Viresh Kumar]

On 09-11-20, 08:08, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 09.11.2020 08:00, Viresh Kumar пишет:
> > On 06-11-20, 21:41, Frank Lee wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 9:18 PM Dmitry Osipenko <digetx at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> 06.11.2020 09:15, Viresh Kumar пишет:
> >>>> Setting regulators for count as 0 doesn't sound good to me.
> >>>>
> >>>> But, I understand that you don't want to have that if (have_regulator)
> >>>> check, and it is a fair request. What I will instead do is, allow all
> >>>> dev_pm_opp_put*() API to start accepting a NULL pointer for the OPP
> >>>> table and fail silently. And so you won't be required to have this
> >>>> unwanted check. But you will be required to save the pointer returned
> >>>> back by dev_pm_opp_set_regulators(), which is the right thing to do
> >>>> anyways.
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps even a better variant could be to add a devm versions of the OPP
> >>> API functions, then drivers won't need to care about storing the
> >>> opp_table pointer if it's unused by drivers.
> >>
> >> I think so. The consumer may not be so concerned about the status of
> >> these OPP tables.
> >> If the driver needs to manage the release, it needs to add a pointer
> >> to their driver global structure.
> >>
> >> Maybe it's worth having these devm interfaces for opp.
> > 
> > Sure if there are enough users of this, I am all for it. I was fine
> > with the patches you sent, just that there were not a lot of users of
> > it and so I pushed them back. If we find that we have more users of it
> > now, we can surely get that back.
> > 
> 
> There was already attempt to add the devm? Could you please give me a
> link to the patches?
> 
> I already prepared a patch which adds the devm helpers. It helps to keep
> code cleaner and readable.

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201012135517.19468-1-frank@allwinnertech.com/

-- 
viresh