[PATCH v10 6/6] dma-buf: Document that dma-buf size is fixed

[Daniel Vetter]

On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 09:25:14AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 05:33:23PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 01:41:17PM -0800, Jianxin Xiong wrote:
> > > The fact that the size of dma-buf is invariant over the lifetime of the
> > > buffer is mentioned in the comment of 'dma_buf_ops.mmap', but is not
> > > documented at where the info is defined. Add the missing documentation.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jianxin Xiong <jianxin.xiong at intel.com>
> > 
> > Applied to drm-misc-next, thanks for your patch. For the preceeding
> > dma-buf patch I'll wait for more review/acks before I apply it. Ack from
> > Jason might also be good, since looks like this dma_virt_ops is only used
> > in rdma.
> 
> We are likely to delete it entirely this cycle, Christoph already has
> a patch series to do it:
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rdma/list/?series=379277
> 
> So, lets just forget about it

I can get behind that :-) Also I realized that even when we need it,
probably best if you merge it to avoid a partially broken feature in the
rdma tree. So not my problem anyway ...

Cheers, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch