[PATCH v2 07/22] drm/msm: Do rpm get sooner in the submit path
Viresh Kumar
viresh.kumar at linaro.org
Thu Nov 19 06:05:28 UTC 2020
On 18-11-20, 08:53, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 9:28 PM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 17-11-20, 09:02, Rob Clark wrote:
> > > With that on top of the previous patch,
> >
> > Don't you still have this ? Which fixed the lockdep in the remove path.
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201022080644.2ck4okrxygmkuatn@vireshk-i7/
> >
> > To make it clear you need these patches to fix the OPP stuff:
> >
> > //From 5.10-rc3 (the one from the above link).
> > commit e0df59de670b ("opp: Reduce the size of critical section in _opp_table_kref_release()")
This fixes debugfs stuff while the OPP table is removed.
> > //Below two from linux-next
> > commit ef43f01ac069 ("opp: Always add entries in dev_list with opp_table->lock held")
> > commit 27c09484dd3d ("opp: Allocate the OPP table outside of opp_table_lock")
This fixes debugfs stuff while the OPP table is added.
> > This matches the diff I gave you earlier.
> >
>
> no, I did not have all three, only "opp: Allocate the OPP table
> outside of opp_table_lock" plus the fixup. But with all three:
And looking at the lockdep you gave now, it looks like we have a
problem with OPP table's internal lock (opp_table->lock) as well apart
from the global opp_table_lock.
I wish there was a way for me to reproduce the lockdep :(
I know this is exhausting for both of us and I really want to be over
with it as soon as possible, this really should be the last patch
here, please try this along with other two. This fixes the debugfs
thing while the OPPs in the OPP table are removed (they are already
added without a lock around debugfs stuff).
AFAIU, there is no further debugfs stuff that happens from within the
locks and so this really should be the last patch unless I missed
something.
--
viresh
-------------------------8<-------------------------
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 11:24:32 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] opp: Reduce the size of critical section in
_opp_kref_release()
There is a lot of stuff here which can be done outside of the
opp_table->lock, do that. This helps avoiding a circular dependency
lockdeps around debugfs.
Reported-by: Rob Clark <robdclark at gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org>
---
drivers/opp/core.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/opp/core.c b/drivers/opp/core.c
index 9d145bb99a59..4268eb359915 100644
--- a/drivers/opp/core.c
+++ b/drivers/opp/core.c
@@ -1251,9 +1251,14 @@ void _opp_free(struct dev_pm_opp *opp)
kfree(opp);
}
-static void _opp_kref_release(struct dev_pm_opp *opp,
- struct opp_table *opp_table)
+static void _opp_kref_release(struct kref *kref)
{
+ struct dev_pm_opp *opp = container_of(kref, struct dev_pm_opp, kref);
+ struct opp_table *opp_table = opp->opp_table;
+
+ list_del(&opp->node);
+ mutex_unlock(&opp_table->lock);
+
/*
* Notify the changes in the availability of the operable
* frequency/voltage list.
@@ -1261,27 +1266,9 @@ static void _opp_kref_release(struct dev_pm_opp *opp,
blocking_notifier_call_chain(&opp_table->head, OPP_EVENT_REMOVE, opp);
_of_opp_free_required_opps(opp_table, opp);
opp_debug_remove_one(opp);
- list_del(&opp->node);
kfree(opp);
}
-static void _opp_kref_release_unlocked(struct kref *kref)
-{
- struct dev_pm_opp *opp = container_of(kref, struct dev_pm_opp, kref);
- struct opp_table *opp_table = opp->opp_table;
-
- _opp_kref_release(opp, opp_table);
-}
-
-static void _opp_kref_release_locked(struct kref *kref)
-{
- struct dev_pm_opp *opp = container_of(kref, struct dev_pm_opp, kref);
- struct opp_table *opp_table = opp->opp_table;
-
- _opp_kref_release(opp, opp_table);
- mutex_unlock(&opp_table->lock);
-}
-
void dev_pm_opp_get(struct dev_pm_opp *opp)
{
kref_get(&opp->kref);
@@ -1289,16 +1276,10 @@ void dev_pm_opp_get(struct dev_pm_opp *opp)
void dev_pm_opp_put(struct dev_pm_opp *opp)
{
- kref_put_mutex(&opp->kref, _opp_kref_release_locked,
- &opp->opp_table->lock);
+ kref_put_mutex(&opp->kref, _opp_kref_release, &opp->opp_table->lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_put);
-static void dev_pm_opp_put_unlocked(struct dev_pm_opp *opp)
-{
- kref_put(&opp->kref, _opp_kref_release_unlocked);
-}
-
/**
* dev_pm_opp_remove() - Remove an OPP from OPP table
* @dev: device for which we do this operation
@@ -1342,30 +1323,49 @@ void dev_pm_opp_remove(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_remove);
+static struct dev_pm_opp *_opp_get_next(struct opp_table *opp_table,
+ bool dynamic)
+{
+ struct dev_pm_opp *opp = NULL, *temp;
+
+ mutex_lock(&opp_table->lock);
+ list_for_each_entry(temp, &opp_table->opp_list, node) {
+ if (dynamic == temp->dynamic) {
+ opp = temp;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ mutex_unlock(&opp_table->lock);
+ return opp;
+}
+
bool _opp_remove_all_static(struct opp_table *opp_table)
{
- struct dev_pm_opp *opp, *tmp;
- bool ret = true;
+ struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
mutex_lock(&opp_table->lock);
if (!opp_table->parsed_static_opps) {
- ret = false;
- goto unlock;
+ mutex_unlock(&opp_table->lock);
+ return false;
}
- if (--opp_table->parsed_static_opps)
- goto unlock;
-
- list_for_each_entry_safe(opp, tmp, &opp_table->opp_list, node) {
- if (!opp->dynamic)
- dev_pm_opp_put_unlocked(opp);
+ if (--opp_table->parsed_static_opps) {
+ mutex_unlock(&opp_table->lock);
+ return true;
}
-unlock:
mutex_unlock(&opp_table->lock);
- return ret;
+ /*
+ * Can't remove the OPP from under the lock, debugfs removal needs to
+ * happen lock less to avoid circular dependency issues.
+ */
+ while ((opp = _opp_get_next(opp_table, false)))
+ dev_pm_opp_put(opp);
+
+ return true;
}
/**
@@ -1377,21 +1377,21 @@ bool _opp_remove_all_static(struct opp_table *opp_table)
void dev_pm_opp_remove_all_dynamic(struct device *dev)
{
struct opp_table *opp_table;
- struct dev_pm_opp *opp, *temp;
+ struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
int count = 0;
opp_table = _find_opp_table(dev);
if (IS_ERR(opp_table))
return;
- mutex_lock(&opp_table->lock);
- list_for_each_entry_safe(opp, temp, &opp_table->opp_list, node) {
- if (opp->dynamic) {
- dev_pm_opp_put_unlocked(opp);
- count++;
- }
+ /*
+ * Can't remove the OPP from under the lock, debugfs removal needs to
+ * happen lock less to avoid circular dependency issues.
+ */
+ while ((opp = _opp_get_next(opp_table, true))) {
+ dev_pm_opp_put(opp);
+ count++;
}
- mutex_unlock(&opp_table->lock);
/* Drop the references taken by dev_pm_opp_add() */
while (count--)
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list