[PATCH v1] drm/bridge: lt9611: Fix handling of 4k panels

[Anibal Limon]

I just tested on non 4k display. Looks good to me.

On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 at 04:46, Robert Foss <robert.foss at linaro.org> wrote:

> 4k requires two dsi pipes, so don't report MODE_OK when only a
> single pipe is configured. But rather report MODE_PANEL to
> signal that requirements of the panel are not being met.
>
> Reported-by: Peter Collingbourne <pcc at google.com>
> Suggested-by: Peter Collingbourne <pcc at google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss at linaro.org>
> Tested-by: John Stultz <john.stultz at linaro.org>
>
Tested-by: Anibal Limon <anibal.limon at linaro.org>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611.c | 8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611.c
> index d734d9402c35..e8eb8deb444b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611.c
> @@ -867,8 +867,14 @@ static enum drm_mode_status
> lt9611_bridge_mode_valid(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>                                                      const struct
> drm_display_mode *mode)
>  {
>         struct lt9611_mode *lt9611_mode = lt9611_find_mode(mode);
> +       struct lt9611 *lt9611 = bridge_to_lt9611(bridge);
>
> -       return lt9611_mode ? MODE_OK : MODE_BAD;
> +       if (!lt9611_mode)
> +               return MODE_BAD;
> +       else if (lt9611_mode->intfs > 1 && !lt9611->dsi1)
> +               return MODE_PANEL;
> +       else
> +               return MODE_OK;
>  }
>
>  static void lt9611_bridge_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> --
> 2.27.0
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20201123/84483bfd/attachment-0001.htm>